Feinstein on Bunker Busters

Posted by Moonage on 29 Apr 2005 | Tagged as: National Politics

This is so cute I had to steal it from LGF:

Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., said the study confirms that nuclear bunker busters cannot dig deep enough to prevent large casualties.

The bottom line is that it would result in the deaths of up to a million people or more if used in densely populated areas, she said in a statement. This is the clearest evidence to date that our nation should not pursue the research and development of these weapons.

And, they come to the exact same conclusion I do:

Got that? For Feinstein, the possibility that these weapons could cause massive casualties to the enemy is an argument against developing them;

Yeah buddy, this is the Democrat Party in high intellectual gear.  They are thinking fast and furious on how to oppose everything.  Problem is, I think, nay, I’ll BET, the average US citizen WANTS a missile that does a lot of damage to the enemy.  If we had this five years ago, we wouldn’t be in Iraq now.

What Feinstein doesn’t get at all is by opposing everything, she’s not espousing anything.  People don’t jump on your bandwagon for opposing everything.  They might agree with you on one topic or another, but, the bottom line is people want solutions to their problems.  Feinstein, Boxer, Kerry, and Dean are not providing answers to people’s individual problems, they are just opposing other people’s efforts to solve them.  Obstructionism will not support the Democrat Party.  Kerry proved it in 2004, and no one on the Democrat national level got it.  Look for a lot more of the same.  Look for the Dems to continue losing.  Pointing their finger at Delay won’t win them a single seat anywhere in the country.  Not one.

Technorati Tags:

One Response to “Feinstein on Bunker Busters”

  1. on 29 Apr 2005 at 5:23 pm 1.Bryan Kerwick said …

    The good Senator from California has no ideas that are rooted in reality. The very idea that we have the technological ability to defend our way of life at the expense of those who wish to do us harm is intensly objectionable to her. Perhaps she thinks that we should just file lawsuits against our enemies and that they would recoil in horror as the legions of attorneys attack their assets as is the norm in this country.

    The Party of No is alive and well in California, Massachusetts and to a lesses degree the Mid-Atlantic States and Upper Mid-West. That is the extent of the Party. The Democratic Party has been hijacked by Hollywood and is a National Party no more.

    2006 will be interesting. The political landscape just gets brighter for the Conservative electorate that is America. The last bastion of Elite Liberalism is in the Judiciary. In 2006 and beyond, that will cease to be.

    I really hope the Party of No continues to provide the electorate with these wonderful tidbits of information to make easier the Conservative Agenda’s election battles.

Trackback This Post | Subscribe to the comments through RSS Feed

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

  • Cindy Sheehan for Senate?
  • Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention
  • Expanding Stem Cell Research
  • Feinstein’s soft on terror?
  • Energy Policy Act of 2005
  • Probing Able Danger
  • Roberts Confirmation
  • Pelosi’s Culture of Corruption: Dianne Feinstein and the DNC
  • Talk about a no-win election
  • Hillary Clinton Popularity Poll
  • Polarization of the US
  • Peter Ricketts in Nebraska
  • Paul Begala
  • Killing the Patriot Act
  • Cynthia McKinney tackles security
  • The real reason to kill The Patriot Act?
  • Obama lurches away from his core
  • What does your rep do during work hours?
  • Bush vetoes the Iraqi pullout bill ( and restores the Constitution )
  • Porkbusting the Gulf Coast?
  • « Partisan Congressional Voting

    General Motors’ Problems »