Judge John Roberts

Posted by Moonage on 19 Jul 2005 | Tagged as: National Politics, The Legal Process

I knew I wouldn’t have to wait long for the inane comments to be unleashed.  Try reconciling these two from the minority party:

"I look forward to the Committee’s findings so that I can make an informed decision about whether Judge Roberts is truly a guardian of the rule of law who puts fairness and justice before ideology." Sen. Hillary Rodham Clintonm D-N.Y.

VS

"Without prejudging the nominee, I do believe Judge Roberts’ record raises questions about his commitment to the right to privacy, protection of the environment and other important issues." Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif.

It’s the duty of a Supreme Court judge to protect the environment?

Whew.  This will be a lot of fun to follow.

Technorati Tags: ,

Tags: ,

No Comments »

Trackback This Post | Subscribe to the comments through RSS Feed

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

  • Confirming John Roberts

  • Sandra Day O’Connor on Judge John Roberts

  • Roberts for Chief Justice

  • Senator Kennedy’s Questions?

  • NARAL, Judge Roberts, and Facts

  • Ted Kennedy on Judge John Roberts

  • Judge John Roberts

  • Breaking up the CIA

  • Roberts gets Kaused

  • My position on Harriet Miers

  • Supreme Court Judge hearings serve no purpose?

  • Miers Withdraws

  • Roberts Confirmation

  • Judge Perkins and Moveon

  • Judge Perkins and Moveon, updated

  • The John Bolton Appointment

  • Janice Rogers Brown

  • Karen Pearl, POTUS?

  • Why we’re losing the war on drugs

  • Wisconsin’s the place to screw dead people

    • « Judge John Roberts

    Ted Kennedy on Judge John Roberts »