NARAL, Judge Roberts, and Facts
Posted by Moonage on 10 Aug 2005 | Tagged as: National Politics
The Pro-Choice activist group NARAL has come out attacking John Roberts. They are issue specific in this attack:
You can see their ad on that link above. Factcheck.org looked at this ad specifically and drew their own disturbing conclusion. They came to exactly the same conclusion I did:
The ad is totally false to the point of being intentionally misleading ( lying ).
And the ad misleads when it says Roberts supported a clinic bomber. It is true that Roberts sided with the bomber and many other defendants in a civil case, but the case didn’t deal with bombing at all. Roberts argued that abortion clinics who brought the suit had no right use an 1871 federal anti-discrimination statute against anti-abortion protesters who tried to blockade clinics. Eventually a 6-3 majority of the Supreme Court agreed, too. Roberts argued that blockades were already illegal under state law…..
To the contrary, during the Reagan administration when he was Associate Counsel to the President, Roberts drafted a memo saying abortion-clinic bombers "should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law." In the 1986 memo, Roberts called abortion bombers "criminals" and "misguided individuals," indicating that they would get no special treatment regarding requests for presidential pardons. Reagan in fact gave no pardons to abortion-clinic bombers.
Gotta keep an eye on these issue oriented activist groups. Think this is just some honest oversight on NARAL’s part? Think again. Here’s their political activity during the 2006 political cycle:
|
And here’s their political activity during the 2004 cycle:
|
NARAL donates 98% to Democrats. Still think they are issue oriented? This slanderous attack on John Roberts should come as no surprise. Even though Roberts considers clinic bombers criminals, he’s Bush’s man. That alone makes him a target of NARAL.
That’s all anyone really needs to know.
*** Disclaimer: Although Republican, I am pro-choice. ***
1 Comment »

on 10 Aug 2005 at 3:51 pm 1.Bryan Kerwick







said …
As I have commented before, why let something as annoying as facts get in the way?
The left has completely lost it’s mind. Abortion rights groups are crying about Judicial appointments primarily because they do not want what the American Electorate is demanding.
If Roe v. Wade were overturned tomorrow, there would be almost no difference. The States would simply have to actually legislate for once. Abortion will never be illegal per se, however, certain procedures will be outlawed in some States, Parent notification would be required in all States where minor children are concerned and some States will actually increase benefits for abortions. Where is the problem?
I am following the Indiana situation closely to see how the courts rule. It is obvious that girls below the age of consent were probably involved in statutory rape in many of the situations, which is a serious crime.
Somehow the abortion rights people think otherwise. Lets wait and see what comes of this.