Second Military Person Joins Able Danger Controversy

Posted by Moonage on 23 Aug 2005 | Tagged as: National Politics

The officer, Scott J. Phillpott, said in a statement today that he could not discuss details of the military program, which was called Able Danger, but confirmed that its analysts had identified the Sept. 11 ringleader, Mohamed Atta, by name by early 2000. "My story is consistent," said Captain Phillpott, who managed the program for the Pentagon’s Special Operations Command. "Atta was identified by Able Danger by January-February of 2000."

OK, lefties, start attacking again. But that still won’t eliminate the questions about the questions. 

  1. What did Sandy Berger steal? 
  2. Why did Sandy do it? 
  3. Why was he only given a slap on the wrist? 
  4. Why is all this coming out now?
  5. Why did the 911 Commission summarily dismiss evidence that directly affected national securiy and attack Condi Rice?
  6. Why do Hamilton and Lee still not see the obvious conflict of interest of having Jamie Gorelick on the commission?

As long as Jamie Gorelick’s on that commission, it has zero credibility.

More blogs on: Sandy Berger, Jamie Gorelick, 911 Commission, Able Danger

Technorati Tags:

Trackback This Post | Subscribe to the comments through RSS Feed

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

  • Speaking of publicly declaring your stupidity…..
  • Probing Able Danger
  • Able Danger
  • Able Danger continued
  • Supporting the Gorelick Commission
  • Mitt Romney joins the 21st century
  • The 911 Commission revisited
  • Democrats pushing the Gorelick cover-up
  • The Man Who Stared Down Danger
  • Feinstein’s soft on terror?
  • John McCain is still a citizen
  • Oklahoma?
  • Berger found guilty of stealing papers
  • Prince Malfunction?
  • Hillary claims your children will die if you don’t vote for McCain?
  • The Guardian Endorses Bush???
  • Jane Fonda joins George Galloway
  • Dan Rather bites the hand that fed him
  • Leading the CIA
  • Jury acquits Jose Luis Nazario
  • « Homefield Disadvantage

    Do unto others as you’d have done to you »