<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Michael Moore owns(ed) Halliburton</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politics.moonagewebdream.com/2005/11/30/michael-moore-ownsed-halliburton/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politics.moonagewebdream.com/2005/11/30/michael-moore-ownsed-halliburton/</link>
	<description>Think</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 23:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Moonage</title>
		<link>http://politics.moonagewebdream.com/2005/11/30/michael-moore-ownsed-halliburton/comment-page-1/#comment-677</link>
		<dc:creator>Moonage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 23:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politics.moonagewebdream.com/2005/11/30/michael-moore-ownsed-halliburton/#comment-677</guid>
		<description>That sounds like a true Moon project actually.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That sounds like a true Moon project actually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan Kerwick</title>
		<link>http://politics.moonagewebdream.com/2005/11/30/michael-moore-ownsed-halliburton/comment-page-1/#comment-676</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Kerwick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 22:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politics.moonagewebdream.com/2005/11/30/michael-moore-ownsed-halliburton/#comment-676</guid>
		<description>Ever wonder why the New York Times never reviews books that portray the liberal agenda and those of the liberal persuasion in any manner except if it is a glowing endorsement to the cause?

If you want to have some fun, compare the books on the best seller list versus the books actually reviewed. As hard as the Times tries to endorse and promote the liberal agenda, the public just aren't buying it. Fox News is so hated by the left primarily due to Fox breaking the elite liberal media stranglehold monopoly on what news we hear and in what light it is portrayed.

The really good news is that corporate america is also following suit although a few steps behind the american public at large. Many of these elite liberal media outlets that have wreaked havok on american industry in their editorial pages are now feeling the pinch in the advertising revenue which is the life blood of any media outlet. The LA Times for example just fired 85 people from their newsroom for precisely this reason. I love capitolism!

Without a monopoly on the news, the Liberal agenda is in serious trouble primarily because america is primarily a conservative country. Let the Michael Moore's and Al Frankens (1 minority hired out of 112) of the world deal with that reality and find themselves broke. Guess thats why NPR and Public Broadcasting Co. are such a big issue with the liberals. At least those outlets don't have to answer to public demand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever wonder why the New York Times never reviews books that portray the liberal agenda and those of the liberal persuasion in any manner except if it is a glowing endorsement to the cause?</p>
<p>If you want to have some fun, compare the books on the best seller list versus the books actually reviewed. As hard as the Times tries to endorse and promote the liberal agenda, the public just aren&#8217;t buying it. Fox News is so hated by the left primarily due to Fox breaking the elite liberal media stranglehold monopoly on what news we hear and in what light it is portrayed.</p>
<p>The really good news is that corporate america is also following suit although a few steps behind the american public at large. Many of these elite liberal media outlets that have wreaked havok on american industry in their editorial pages are now feeling the pinch in the advertising revenue which is the life blood of any media outlet. The LA Times for example just fired 85 people from their newsroom for precisely this reason. I love capitolism!</p>
<p>Without a monopoly on the news, the Liberal agenda is in serious trouble primarily because america is primarily a conservative country. Let the Michael Moore&#8217;s and Al Frankens (1 minority hired out of 112) of the world deal with that reality and find themselves broke. Guess thats why NPR and Public Broadcasting Co. are such a big issue with the liberals. At least those outlets don&#8217;t have to answer to public demand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
