The Rise and Fall of governor ratings

Posted by Moonage on 22 Mar 2006 | Tagged as: Polls


SurveyUSA came out with their governors’ popularity polls for 2006
.  I
love looking at these things.  Here’s some things I noticed:

  • Compared to 2005, 10 Republican governors are losing popularity, 6
    Democrat governors are as well.
  • Compared to 2005, 17 Republican  governors are gaining popularity,
    15 Democrat governors are as well.
  • In 2005, 11 Republican governors were more unpopular than popular ( can
    you say, in trouble? ), 7 Democrat governors were as well.
  • In 2006, 8 Republican governors are in trouble, 7 Democrat governors as
    well.
  • There are currently 28 Republican governors, 22 Democrat.  This
    means at this time, 31% of the Republican governors could be in trouble, 29%
    of the Democrat governors.  In 2005, those figures were higher for
    Republicans and exactly the same for Democrats.
  • The most unpopular governor, bar none, is Bob Taft of Ohio.  He’s
    done a pretty good job in apparently alienating his own party.
  • The governor sinking fastest, bar none, is Kathleen Blanco of Louisiana. 
    Good.
  • The two fastest rising stars are Bob Riley of Alabama ( 29% swing ), and
    Haley Barbour of Mississippi ( 28% swing ).

My conclusions are:

  • What sticks out to me the most is that given the perceived unpopularity
    of President Bush, you’d think that the Republicans would be more adversely
    affected than what is showing.  However, the Republican governors are
    picking up spots while the Democrats have remained the same.  If the
    elections for all 50 states were held tomorrow, the counts look like they
    would remain pretty much the same.  That leads me to believe the same
    thing I’ve always believed, all politics are local.
  • Of the states affected most by Katrina, the Republican governors have
    experienced a huge increase in popularity while the lone Democrat is falling
    like a brick.  All media focused on placing all blame on FEMA and Bush. 
    Stars came out trashing Bush.  However, it appears the local people
    perceived things a little differently.  FEMA is FEMA, it didn’t respond
    any differently for Louisiana than it did for Mississippi or Alabama. 
    Sure, the impact of Katrina was different, but the leadership format is
    exactly the same in all three states.  People in Mississippi and
    Alabama have rewarded their governor, the people of Louisiana have pretty
    much abandoned theirs.  Bottom line, the local people apparently have
    seen the difference in effective leaders and ineffective leaders regardless
    of what major media reported.  That’s a good thing.  Kathleen
    Blanco taking the worst hit in the US makes me feel a LOT better about
    things.
  • Last and probably least, the nature of politics on a national level is
    like a pendulum, it swings one way and then the other.  Local politics
    is usually more stagnant.  The party in power tends to remain in power
    for long periods of time.  What I’m getting at is although some
    governors are in horrid shape, the people voting will simply vote for
    another member of the same party.  What you most definitely can not do
    is use these polls to gauge any national trend.  A couple of governors
    are of the minority party in their state, and are in bad shape.  In
    those two states you can probably fairly predict the majority party will
    take them back, but in some states such as Louisiana, no matter how
    unpopular the Democrat is, their replacement will most likely be yet another
    Democrat.  Because of that, I didn’t bother to make any predictions on
    a national level based on these numbers.
  • Numbers are fun to play with.  But when it comes to local politics,
    that’s all they’re good for.

On a more local level,

RCP has pointed to races this fall that these numbers might give a clue to some
changes
:

  • Ehrlich (R-MD): plus 4 net rating (48 approve - 44 disapprove)
  • Rendell (D-PA): plus 3 net rating (49-46)
  • Perry (R-TX): plus 1 net rating (48-47)
  • Doyle (D-WI): minus 4 net rating (44-48)
  • Granholm (D-MI): minus 7 net rating (45-52)
  • Blagojevich (D-IL): minus 8 net rating (44-52)
  • Minner (D-DE): minus 11 net rating (41-52)
  • Baldacci (D-ME): minus 16 net rating (39-55)
  • Kulongoski (D-OR): minus 20 net rating (36-56)
  • Schwarzenegger (R-CA): minus 35 net rating (36-61)
  • Murkowski (R-AK): minus 36 net rating (29-65)

That’s seven Democrats and four Republicans.  Once again, that seems to
totally buck what major media is telling us.

Technorati Tags:

Trackback This Post | Subscribe to the comments through RSS Feed

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

  • Bush worst approval ratings ever?
  • Approval ratings and winning
  • Politics of terrorism revisited again
  • The RNC Bounce
  • Piers Morgan’s fall
  • Bushism of the day: Obama style
  • Indictments put on hold for Fletcher
  • Local Politics are the best
  • Prosecuting your way to the mansion?
  • Fact vs Rhetoric: Kentucky Governor’s race
  • On the Republican debate tonight
  • Americans prefer a felon or Harry Reid?
  • Profiling
  • Obama Bushism of the day: Governor of a town?
  • Steve Forbes takes aim at Congress taking aim at oil companies
  • John Kerry doing it again
  • Crunch time for the candidates?
  • No more corruption in Kentucky?
  • The only thing less popular than the President is…….
  • Michael Steele - average white Republican?
  • « Charlie Daniels vs media bias

    The Patriot Guard »