Analyzing Charlie Sheen
Posted by Moonage on 23 Apr 2006 | Tagged as: Conspiracy Theories
A while back I did a piece on Charlie Sheen connecting dots regarding 9/11 and coming up with a whacked out conspiracy theory that only someone looking for a whacked out theory could believe. People then basically insinuated in somewhat simple terms that I was whacked out for not believing whacked out theories by whacked out Hollywood types. I didn’t really believe them, but tired of the rather banal debate. However, someone who knows Charlie better than I or any of the debaters here to this point as spoken out on the mentality it takes to believe the 9/11 Conspiracy theory:
The restraining order is the latest chapter in the stormy marriage between Sheen, a one-time playboy, and model/actress Richards, 35, who filed for divorce from him last December, after less than three years of marriage.
I really like this part:
Im deeply saddened because this is clearly demonstrating a wanting and willful attempt at what I describe as a radical and transparent smear campaign and clearly a departure from sound, sane, responsible co-parenting, Sheen said.
It is a reaction to a failed marriage, a reaction to some twisted desire — real or imagined — to hurt, to punish, to discredit, to completely torpedo, to undermine my perception as a responsible father … a contributing father, a guy who would give his life for his children.
Seems like he recognizes the strategy quite well.
For the lurid details, and they are QUITE lurid, Smoking Gun has the warrant.
1 Comment »

on 23 Apr 2006 at 8:45 pm 1.insider said …
Moon:
As you know (since you helped in the debate), we at Independent Sources wrote on Sheen’s theories and had over 300 comments spread over two posts. We too were taken to task over our questioning the “bravery” of Mr. Sheen for acting like a paranoid loon, when in fact (at least according to sworn statements by Mrs. Sheen) that this is exactly what he is. If your readers are interested they can click on my name for a link and see a lot more detail on the allegations.