Adjustable Rate Mortgages

Posted by Moonage on 19 Jun 2006 | Tagged as: Opinions

I get about five emails every day telling me how much money I can save on my mortgage.  I got one yesterday that offered me up to 80% equity on my appraised value of $830,000.  For what it’s worth, my current value is about 1/5th that.  I should have taken that one I guess.  However, ARM’s have been stealing traditional bank mortgages for about a decade with promises of cheaper mortgages.  However, this is what the reality is becoming for those that took them:

In 2003, Anita Britten refinanced her two-story brick cottage in Lithonia, Ga. using a hybrid adjustable rate mortgage, or ARM. Her lender reassured her that she could refinance out of the riskier loan into a traditional one when her interest rate started to reset.

Three years later, Britten can’t get a new mortgage and her monthly payment has jumped by a third in six months. She can’t afford her payments and may face foreclosure if her financial situation doesn’t change.

Folks, for lack of a simpler term, are the Universal Life Insurance policies of the 21st century.  They look great when the numbers are cooked.  Promises of future value, as in trading back to a normal mortgage, make them look safe.  As with anything that offers no value for a cheaper price, they’ll screw you when you can’t afford to be screwed.  When you’re least able to switch to a traditional policy, that’s when the rates go up.  Although the minimum rate is set by the feds for the most part, the maximum rate is totally at the discretion of the lender within federal law.  But, if you maxed out your credit at the cheaper rate, bumping it up 5% is not unlawful, and they will have your asset for a discounted price.  That asset will most likely be your home.

When you’re buying a home, get a fixed quote for 30 years.  If you can’t afford that, find a cheaper home.  Leave the creative financing to the speculators and those that can afford to lose that asset.

People peddling ARM’s to people that can barely afford them are practicing unethical lending practices.

In 2003, Bob Ney introduced the Responsible Lending Act.  It would have regulated brokers and defined some illegal activities.  It however, did not address what I consider the bait and switch tactics of ARMs. 25 Congressmen co-signed the legislation:

Rep Barrett, J. Gresham [SC-3] - 6/19/2003 Rep Beauprez, Bob [CO-7] - 9/23/2003
Rep Boyd, Allen [FL-2] - 9/17/2003 Rep Brown, Henry E., Jr. [SC-1] - 4/8/2003
Rep Brown-Waite, Ginny [FL-5] - 5/13/2004 Rep Cantor, Eric [VA-7] - 5/8/2003
Rep Cox, Christopher [CA-48] - 10/8/2003 Rep Fossella, Vito [NY-13] - 7/9/2003
Rep Gillmor, Paul E. [OH-5] - 2/13/2003 Rep Hart, Melissa A. [PA-4] - 9/23/2003
Rep Hill, Baron P. [IN-9] - 7/9/2003 Rep LaHood, Ray [IL-18] - 10/8/2003
Rep Lucas, Ken [KY-4] - 2/13/2003 Rep Manzullo, Donald A. [IL-16] - 11/4/2003
Rep Miller, Gary G. [CA-42] - 2/13/2003 Rep Myrick, Sue [NC-9] - 6/18/2003
Rep Peterson, Collin C. [MN-7] - 7/25/2003 Rep Platts, Todd Russell [PA-19] - 9/17/2003
Rep Rehberg, Dennis R. [MT] - 6/19/2003 Rep Rogers, Harold [KY-5] - 9/5/2003
Rep Stenholm, Charles W. [TX-17] - 7/25/2003 Rep Thompson, Bennie G. [MS-2] - 5/19/2003
Rep Tiberi, Patrick J. [OH-12] - 5/13/2004 Rep Towns, Edolphus [NY-10] - 10/28/2003
Rep Weller, Jerry [IL-11] - 4/8/2003

However, it promptly died in the Subcommittee on Housing and Community Opportunity.  Oddly enough, Bob Ney is chairman of that subcommittee:

Robert W. Ney OH  Chairman
Gary G. Miller CA Vice Chairman
Richard H. Baker LA
Walter B. Jones, Jr. NC
Christopher Shays CT
Patrick J. Tiberi OH
Ginny Brown-Waite FL
Katherine Harris FL
Rick Renzi AZ
Stevan Pearce NM
Randy Neugebauer TX
Michael G. Fitzpatrick PA
Geoff Davis KY
John Campbell CA
  Maxine Waters CA
Nydia M. Velázquez NY
Julia Carson IN
Barbara Lee CA
Michael E. Capuano MA
Bernard Sanders VT *
Stephen F. Lynch MA
Brad Miller NC
David Scott GA
Artur Davis AL
Emanuel Cleaver MO
Al Green TX

Now, what I’d like to see, is that legislation re-introduced, but with legislation addressing the abuses of ARMs added to it.  Unless the worst case scenario is provided to people buying ARMs, they are bait and switch preying on the people most vulnerable.

Then, maybe all those pesky deceptive spam emails will stop as well.  Let’s start with seeing if we can figure out why it died in subcommittee for starters.  This is no time for pandering.

Technorati Tags:

Trackback This Post | Subscribe to the comments through RSS Feed

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

  • Keith Ellison’s Utopia
  • The root of a cause…. Wall-E
  • Kent Conrad is lying
  • Share of U.S. in labor force to fall
  • Collapsing Birth Rates
  • The bane of being physically fit
  • Worst president since Hoover?
  • Nancy Pelosi’s destroying the country
  • Supporting the Ripon High School Cheerleaders
  • What difference does the Speaker make?
  • Useful Links
  • Roe v Wade and the crime rate
  • Bush Tax Cuts, Again?
  • The Florida Sex Offenders Law
  • Minimum Wage Increase
  • McCain and regulation
  • Marcy Kaptur tackles the subprime mess
  • Ben Bernanke ( Goodbye Alan Greenspan! )
  • The Supreme Court looks at insurance
  • Medicare and SSI Necessary Changes
  • « A House divided?

    Preparing for the North Korean missile test »