WTO wants to legalize gambling where gambling is illegal

Posted by Moonage on 30 Oct 2006 | Tagged as: International Issues

In a ruling that could open the United States to offshore Internet gambling, a World Trade Organization panel Wednesday said Washington should drop prohibitions on Americans placing bets in online casinos.

In its final 287-page report, the WTO panel confirmed the preliminary ruling it issued in March in a dispute pitting the United States against the tiny Caribbean nation of Antigua and Barbuda, saying the ban represented an unfair trade barrier.

I got issues here.  Some places don’t benefit from gambling.  Some places, like my home town, outright ban gambling.  We didn’t ban casinos, we banned gambling.  There are a lot of social problems that come with gambling.  If it’s legal, then more often than not social support is put in place to deal with those problems FROM the revenues those activities generate.  What Antigua and Barbuda are saying is they want the money while towns like mine pay for the problems.  That’s just not right folks.  I personally could care less if gambling’s legal or not.  But, if you’re going to tempt people with a vice that can be very damaging, you better spend some money dealing with it.  If Antigua and Barbuda want to send money to the US to compensate for all the damage their activity could incur, then I might ease up on them.  As it is, I think this is a horrible suggestion by the World Trade Organization. The United States, along with any other country that does not wish to have gambling, has the right to protect their citizens from that activity.  If gambling were legal countrywide, THEN Antigua and Barbuda would have a valid argument.

Secondly, very few of these gambling organizations are even IN Antigua and Barbuda.  They sit in places like New York and Los Angeles, form a company in those little countries, and do what they can’t do within the US.  So, for Antigua and Barbuda to make the claim this is an "unfair trade practice" is horribly disingenious to me.  For the World Trade Organization to not recognize that fact in this dispute to me is equally disingenious.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Trackback This Post | Subscribe to the comments through RSS Feed

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

  • Gambling can be a problem
  • Fact vs Rhetoric: Kentucky Governor’s race
  • Alcohol Kills
  • Soros the Drug Kingpin? pt2
  • McCain Kennedy Illegal Immigration Bill
  • VIncente Fox hates The Border Wall
  • Illegal use of yourself?
  • Tides and McCain-Feingold
  • Border Agents pardon petition
  • End Slavery in the US NOW!
  • A little thingy on prostitution
  • What to do with the people at Gitmo?
  • What to do about Abramoff?
  • The politics of warrantless wiretaps
  • Illegal Aliens
  • Why the anti-war forces get so frustrated
  • What do Anna and Ryan have in common?
  • Never trust a politician offering favors
  • Whoopi doesn’t seem to think much of the South
  • Warren Jeffs kissing young girls.
  • « Rewarding Stupidity

    ACLU endorses the Patriot Act? »