Posted by Moonage on 25 Jan 2007 | Tagged as: 2008 Presidential Race, Polls
Duncan Hunter from California is in. I think he’s a long-shot at best. I really get the feeling he’s just using 2008 to get his feet wet for a ‘12 shot.
What do you all think?
2 Comments »
 |
527's 2004 Presidential Election 2006 US Senate Races 2008 Congressional Races 2008 Presidential Race Border Control Businesses Comments from the Host Conspiracy Theories Corporal Punishment economic-policy Education Energy Policy Entitlement Programs Ethics Events Fed Policy Fun with Numbers General Government Health Care Debate Hollywood X-List Humor Idiot of the day International Issues International Politics Iran Katrina Legislative Process Media media bias National Debt National Politics National Security Oil Policy Oil Supply Opinions People Personal Finances Political Correctness Politics Polls Racism Red Hot liberal babes Resources Senate Races Shock and Awe Social Sciences Supporting the Death Penalty terrorism The Legal Process The Media Trends Uncategorized US Regional Politics War On Drugs Weblogs Webrings
Free WordPress Theme | Web Hosting Bluebook | Hosted at Hyperial.
on 23 Mar 2007 at 3:53 am 1.www.DavidOsborne.net said …
Duncan Hunter is THE best candidate for 2008, I get sick of hearing conservatives tell me that he WOULD be their FIRST choice but he “can’t win” that is garbage.. it is WAY too early in the game, and the PRIMARY is where you vote for your FIRST CHOICE…
FReegards,
David
on 23 Mar 2007 at 8:47 am 2.Moonage
said …
In 1980, Ron Reagan was the candidate that couldn’t win. In 1992, Bill Clinton was the candidate that couldn’t win. The candidate that wins is the candidate most people feel comfortable with on election day. As such, you won’t see me saying there is any candidate, for either party, that “can’t win”. Some definitely are longer shots than others. I like Duncan Hunter OK. I like Condi best, but she’s not going to run.