Paying for Congressional families’ trips

This one just boggles me.

Pentagon officials are bracing for a fight with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) over her desire to allow lawmakers€™ adult children to tag along on taxpayer-funded travel for free. Pelosi wants them to be able to fill the role of lawmakers€™ spouses when the latter are unable to make a trip because of health issues or work commitments…..

OK, so in her effort to clean up the Republican Culture of Corruption, Nancy Pelosi is wanting to expand Congressional perks and hide the public’s ability to question earmarks. That’s just this week.

I honestly haven’t dug too deep into this issue. But, I got to wonder, will this include partners of the gay Representatives? What about significant others for those Representatives in open relationships? Pets?

I don’t think her request was too well thought out. However, I’m watching CNN and MSNBC for the rest of the story.

Author’s note: I thought I had the scoop on this since I read some really boring stuff, however, I was wrong:

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

3 Responses to “Paying for Congressional families’ trips”

  1. Stormwarning says:

    On the otherhand…if a Congressman is a widower and is on an official trip during which his wife might otherwise have a role, is it appropriate for the Congressman’s daughter, son or his sister to take the role?

  2. eric says:

    Hello.

    I would consider it a privilege if you would add my blog “The Tygrrrr Express” http://www.blacktygrrrr.wordpress.com to your list of linked sites if you feel the quality is high.

    Happy June.

    eric

  3. Moonage says:

    It really depends on the trip, how it’s arranged, and who it’s to see. Depending on the culture of the visit, it can be determined that a family member is appropriate and if the wife is not available, one of them could go. Additionally, members can take members of their family if their wife is not available, but it would come out of their expenses. Children go all the time. That’s not the issue. The issue is Nancy promised to cut wasteful spending and is now demanding the Pentagon carry the expense regardless of who goes. Although great potentially for the kids, there really is no need for ANY family to go. Areas that she wants cut are military and homeland security. Which is more important?

Leave a Reply

Somewhat Possibly Related Posts

  • Banning Congressional Private travel?
  • NO Police Take a vacation
  • Support the border agent families
  • Congressional Black Caucus visits Cuba
  • Edwards campaign energy policy
  • The National Debt
  • Sounds like Communism……
  • Capricorn One
  • Bush’s health care incentive
  • Can the FBI search a congressional office?
  • The Socialization of credit cards
  • Nancy Pelosi’s socialist economics
  • Oxycontin pushers finally pay
  • Putting socialists with ethics issues in charge of ethics?
  • Nancy Pelosi’s destroying the country
  • Obama hearts Goldman Sachs
  • Share of U.S. in labor force to fall
  • Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington – Beyond DeLay
  • Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington – Beyond DeLay
  • Health Insurance Reform passes
  • NAVIGATION



    Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE