Whoopi doesn’t seem to think much of the South

Whoopi Goldberg replaced Rosie Odonnell on The View.  Rosie being gone is a good thing because Rosie seemed to rely on rhetoric, stupidity, and generalizations as a basis for most of “the views”.  However, Whoopi’s been known to drop some stupid bombs of her own in the past.  Apparently not much has changed by replacing Rosie with Whoopi as Whoopi dropped this stupid bomb yesterday:

“from where he comes from” in the South, dogfighting isn’t that unusual.

“It’s like cockfighting in Puerto Rico,” she said. “There are certain things that are indicative to certain parts of the country.”

OK, for starters, dogfighting is NOT that common here.  I’ve never been to one, I’ve never even heard of one.  There was some cockfighting going on when I was younger, but that sort of lost it’s glamour about twenty years ago around here.  Now, it probably still happens, but it’s rogue idiots doing it, not anything organized or anything.  And, if caught, they will go to prison and that’s the end of it.  In simple terms, it’s as condoned here as whereever Whoopi lives now.  Dogfighting’s the same.  It may happen here, but it’s probably more likely to happen in Los Angeles than here.  Simple math makes it so, there’s more people in Los Angeles than a lot of the South combined.

Some simple facts here for Rosie Whoopi:

  1. Dogfighting is illegal in all 50 states.  It can be punishable as a felony.  Even viewing a dogfight is illegal in 48 states.  Also included is Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, and the District of Columbia.

  2. Some states have various aspects of dogfighting that are not prosecuted as felonies.  Those are:

    1. Sponsoring a dogfight:  Idaho and Wyoming

    2. Possessing fighting dogs: Georgia, Idaho, Nevada, New York, Texas, West Virginia, Wyoming

    3. Being a spectator: Alaska, Arkansas, California, Delaware, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, New York, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming.

 OK, the facts. 

  • As far as sponsoring a fight, 100% of the non-felony states are NOT “where he comes from”.

  • As far as possessing fighting dogs, 71% of the non-felony states are NOT “where he comes from”.

  • As far as being a spectator, 80% of the non-felony states are NOT “where he came from”.

So, her generalization that it’s not that unusual “where he came from” is not in the least bit by existing laws.  Now, laws might not reflect prevelance, but it does reflect public sentiment most usually.  Especially in regards to social norms. 

If Whoopi needs more evidence it’s not a “where he’s from” exclusive activity, here’s a headline from a couple of weeks ago with some pretty impressive numbers:

Two years ago, police and animal control officers arrested 78 people and seized $50,000 in a raid of a San Francisco warehouse where they broke up what they suspected was a regional dogfighting championship. Thelocation, in the heart of the city, surprised even veteran animal control officers.

78, read seventy-eight, people busted in one sting.  That wasn’t Georgia, that was San Francisco, California.  That’s not where Vick’s from, that’s a lot closer to where Whoopi’s from.

She’s relying on stereotypes and rhetoric.  That’s the same crap Rosie did.  Try researching an issue before spewing it on public television.  This garbage is what has kept the United States divided, not the political candidates.  And, by pointing the finger in one direction only, it allows the places that still do condone this activity to some degree to continue doing so since there’s no public heat to do anything about it.  Apparently one of those places is Whoopi’s back yard.

Barbara, you could have done so much better than this.  Whoopi is apparently very stupid too.  It’s gotten so consistent of late it’s starting to make me think this is the company Barbara chooses to associate with.  One thing that is common down here is the phrase “birds of a feather”.  Know-what-mean, Barbara?

Related Posts

  • February 23, 2009 -- Bipartisanship and Medicaid (1)
    Just got the numbers for the Medicaid add-on from the stimulus package.  I don't deal with Medicaid directly, but it indirectly affects what I do in a large way.  As such, I was interested in the n...
  • September 18, 2007 -- Barry Manilow takes a stand (0)
    Apparently Barry Manilow decided to take a stand.  He will NOT perform on the same stage as Elisabeth Hasselbeck.  Apparently he's afraid he will suffer the same fate as Rosie.  I find this tactic ...
  • October 12, 2010 -- Whoopi on civility? (1)
    Whoopi Goldberg is now trying to make money bemoaning the loss of civility. I kid you not. She has written an entire book about it. Seriously, she has: This of course came out right abo...
  • August 28, 2007 -- Larry Craig and the homophobe card (0)
    I pretty much figured this would happen a lot sooner than I did find it.  Jeff Fecke at Shakesville ponders: ....if Craig had been arrested for public nudity or having sex in a bathroom stall, I c...
  • September 11, 2007 -- Kathy Griffin’s Emmy speech (2)
    Kathy Griffin won an Emmy for making people laugh.  Well some people anyway, I don't have a clue who she is.  However, she felt compelled to undo that laughter with her acceptance speech: "A lot o...

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

NAVIGATION