Who gets to define torture?

Posted by Moonage on 31 Oct 2007 | Tagged as: Idiot of the day, National Security, Political Correctness

There’s a lot being said over waterboarding.  Michael Mukasey’s nomination is said to be “drowning” over this one single issue.  Joe Biden and Patrick Leahy, who are prone to oppose just about anything for the sake of politics, are “concerned” that Mukasey, rather than completely cowering and denouncing PC-torture-procedure-of-the-day, stated he’d rather look at each instance as it occurs to see what laws were broken.  Imagine that, a lawyer who’d rather look at the facts as opposed to publicly pinning himself in a corner.  How stupid can he be?  Leahy and Biden could care less about circumstances, they want to define what the military can or can not do in a way that strikes back to the days of “the wall“.  It was the pandering of the CIA director to a political flunky to the Attorney General that led to the events of 9/11.  Biden and Leahy were here then.  They should know as well or better than anyone what happens when politicians wank security and defense issues.

But that’s exactly what they are doing now.  And no one is calling their bluff.  They are trying to micro-manage our ability to collect information by pinning this entire nomination on one issue that is probably never used and very few people even know what it is.  The next nomination, if Mukasey fails, will know they have to pander to Biden and Leahy in order to get the nomination.  That scares me folks.

Even if we never do waterboarding ( whatever the hell that is ), I’d like for our enemies to at least think we did on a very regular basis.  Biden and Leahy would like them to think that if they do get caught, they’ll get a vacation where they’re well-fed, rested, and primed and ready to go at it again.

That’s just stupid.

I’d be more concerned if I thought Biden had a ghost chance in hell of winning.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

Trackback This Post | Subscribe to the comments through RSS Feed

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

  • Congress fails to over-ride waterboarding ban veto
  • Q: Did the Democrats go soft on terror? ( A: They always were )
  • Gay Marriage ban defeated in US Senate
  • Harry Reid only believes the story he wants to believe ( and puts words in people’s mouths, and lies )
  • Sweet Neo Con
  • Freedom From Consequences
  • Salon on Abu Ghraib
  • The Death of Rachel Corrie
  • Ted Kennedy’s Torture
  • United Church of Christ Ad Controversy
  • Hillary and the Black Panthers
  • The 2004 Debates, Round One
  • Understanding the Right
  • We’re so mad we’ll kill each other some more?
  • When pork is just pork
  • Is Al Qaeda Just a Bush Boogeyman?
  • Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention, Part II
  • The Wind of Change
  • Supreme Court on Home Seizure
  • John McCain’s three year implosion?
  • « Help sue the Westboro Church

    Eliot Spitzer, Hillary Clinton, a debate, and eight terrorists »