Muddling the party lines

Posted by Moonage on 03 Sep 2008 | Tagged as: 2008 Presidential Race

In the past, and sometimes nowadays, I have pretty much tired of political parties.  We’re in the 21st century.  The tool necessary to get the word out in the 18th century just isn’t necessary anymore.  Never has party unity and loyalty been any more muddled than this year.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

2 Responses to “Muddling the party lines”

  1. on 04 Sep 2008 at 12:15 am 1.Tired of Dorkwads said …

    Learn your topic before you blog, please.

    1) Palin also recently addressed a Libertarian Party audience.

    2)Barr is running as a Libertarian, not as an independent.

    3) Cynthia McKinney is from GA, not CA.

    4) Ron Paul is no longer running for any office but his congressional seat, for which he has no opposition.

    If you are going to post articles on the internet, do the rest of us a favor and be factually correct first.

  2. on 04 Sep 2008 at 7:55 am 2.Moonage said …

    Read before you whine.

    I state clearly McKinney is from Georgia. She now lives in California. Look it up.

    Being as Libertarians are not recognized as a major party, I lump them in the independents ( with the little “i”, as in an adjective. ). If I were to concern myself with every single “party” designation, I’d have to remember the names of the parties of all 100 or so people running for President. I just don’t feel like doing that. As such, if they are not Republican or Democrat, at this time, they are independent ( with the little “i”). Whenever the Libertarians feel like doing the things it takes to be considered a “major party”, then people will refer to them along the same lines as the other two. Until then, they’re all independents ( with the little “i” ).

    As for Palin, I didn’t list everything everyone has done, I just cited some examples. I don’t consider that an omission or error. Adding to the list is fine, saying I’m wrong because I didn’t list every single instance of every single person isn’t. Palin may have spoken to the Libertarians as well. I’m sure she’s spoken to some Democrats as well. I don’t know. Her speaking to the AIP is what the Dems are making a deal of and is on Youtube.

    As I stated, Ron Paul is running for something. One doesn’t hold a rally in Minnesota to garner votes in Texas. If that’s all he’s doing, then he’s just detracting from the party that helped get him elected in the first place and makes me think even less of him. Him holding a “competing convention” and selling himself as a party outsider while using party money just doesn’t strike me as “no longer running for any office but his congressional seat, for which he has no opposition”. Just because he’s no longer running in 2008 doesn’t mean he doesn’t have plans for the future.

    I am factually correct in what I have posted. Your interpretation and inability to thoroughly read it is the problem here. That’s a huge problem on the internet these days. People are given the facts, they just interpret it as they see fit initially and run with it without assuring themselves they actually understand what it is they read. How can I say someone is from Georgia and you not read that I say “someone is from Georgia”? How could I have been any clearer?

Trackback This Post | Subscribe to the comments through RSS Feed

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

  • The CAFTA 15
  • Kerry and picket lines
  • Alan Keyes and immorality
  • Iowa caucus - age matters
  • Renewing the US Patriot Act
  • Democracy is Dead
  • The Stem Cell Ban
  • Workforce and Elections
  • US Red Neck Special Forces
  • Peace in the Middle East?
  • Independent voters key to New Hampshire primary?
  • How to scuttle a presidential bid
  • International team to monitor presidential election
  • 2006 Telecommunications bill
  • Pelosi now ENDORSES the culture of corruption
  • The Price of murdering homeless people
  • What do you get with a divided house?
  • Howard Dean’s White Christian Party
  • California Proposition 62
  • Japanese leaders endorse Bush
  • « Obama Bushism of the day: Governor of a town?

    Media Double standard? »