Bush’s legacy

On Tuesday we’ll hand over the reigns to the presidency to Barack Obama.  Last night Bush gave his farewell address.  Immediately people have been assessing Bush’s legacy.  First of all, since media in general has a way of thoroughly abusing words, let’s examine the word “legacy” real quick-like:

leg⋅a⋅cy   /ˈlɛgəsi/ Show Spelled Pronunciation  [leg-uh-see] noun, plural -cies. 

  1. Law. a gift of property, esp. personal property, as money, by will; a bequest. 
  2. anything handed down from the past, as from an ancestor or predecessor: the legacy of ancient Rome.  
  3. an applicant to or student at a school that was attended by his or her parent. 
  4. Obsolete. the office, function, or commission of a legate.
  5. –adjective. of or pertaining to old or outdated computer hardware, software, or data that, while still functional, does not work well with up-to-date systems.

Now, we can immediately rule out definitions 1, 3, 4, and 5.  The commonly accepted definition of legacy in this case is in fact “anything handed down from the past, as from an ancestor or predecessor.”  I stress this for a reason that is probably obvious already.  Bush’s legacy will be what our descendants think of Bush, not what we think of him.  That would be our opinion of Bush.  Now, since most media is rather loathe to admit to us that 99% of what they print and say are opinions, and not in fact, facts, they’re going to call it anything other than what it is.  You have not seen one true expression of Bush’s legacy yet.  Period.  It’s impossible.  You are seeing a lot of opinions of Bush.  And, to say the least, there is nothing special about that.  A lot of things in the future, some tangible and some intangible, will affect Bush’s legacy.  There is no way on God’s green Earth these pundits can anticipate all the events and changing of attitudes over a period of time.  In one year it will look one way, in five years totally another, in twenty, well, you get the picture.  I’ll just wait it out and see what future generations think about Bush, if they ponder it at all.  My gut feeling is Bush’s legacy will dominated by the events that occurred.  All the rhetoric you hear now will be totally forgotten over time, as it is with every president.  What is left are the major events and how they responded.  So, let’s just see how the remnants of those events play out through the course of the next couple of decades and see how that affects Bush’s legacy.

Related Posts

  • January 15, 2009 -- Is an extravagant inauguration more needed now? (0)
    This is making the rounds: Four years ago, the Associated Press and others in the press suggested it was in poor taste for Republicans to spend $40 million on President Bush’s inauguration. AP wri...
  • July 20, 2007 -- Valerie Plame’s suit dismissed (0)
    This just in ( sorta ): Plame's Suit Against Top Officials Dismissed U.S. District Judge John D. Bates said that Cheney and the others could not be held liable for the disclosures in the sum...
  • February 13, 2006 -- Time Magazine’s Bush/Abramoff pics (2)
    Time Magazine has released the "damning" pics of Bush with Jack Abramoff that has Nancy Pelosi so tore up. Here it is: See the red circle? That's Time's idea of a smoking gun. From Time...
  • August 27, 2007 -- Alberto Gonzales resigning (2)
    Alberto Gonzales was one of the architects of The Patriot Act.  He was also the legal mastermind in keeping it afloat.  He did this initially more or less discretely.  However, in November 2004 Bus...
  • July 9, 2007 -- Hillary hypocrisy regarding Libby? (0)
    There is a raging debate going. Well, not exactly raging, a lot of the media won't even mention it. But, those that do, are debating Bill and Hillary Clinton's hypocrisy regarding Scooter Libby. ...

Tags: ,

NAVIGATION