Recess appointments

President Obama is complaining because the minority party is holding up 200 of his judicial appointments.

“I respect the Senate’s role to advise and consent, but for months, qualified, non-controversial nominees for critical positions in government — often positions related to our national security — have been held up despite having overwhelming support,” Obama said in a news conference Tuesday.

That is true.  What is also true is some Senators are publicly complaining about the practice:

“The abuse of power and the cloak of secrecy from the White House continues. … It’s a devious maneuver that evades the constitutional requirement of Senate consent and only further darkens the cloud over Mr. Bolton’s credibility at the U.N.”

Well, actually, that’s what Ted Kennedy said in 2005 when Bush did what Obama’s threatening to do now.  Another Democrat who had an opinion:

“The president has the right to make this recess appointment, but it’s the wrong decision. It only diminishes John Bolton’s validity and leverage to secure America’s goals at the U.N. John Bolton has been rejected twice by the Senate to serve as our Ambassador to the United Nations. This is not the way to fill our most important diplomatic jobs.”

Well, that was John Kerry complaining about Bush too.  Let me look a little further:

It’s an unnecessary result, and the latest abuse of power by the Bush White House. ..

Harry Reid

“It’s sad that even while the president preaches democracy around the world, he bends the rules and circumvents the will of Congress in appointing our representative to the United Nations.”

Frank R. Lautenberg.

On and on it goes.  The Democrats were totally appalled at the gall of Bush making a recess appointment.  Now, the Democrats are totally appalled that the Republicans have somehow figured out how to do exactly what they were doing four years ago.

Here’s a way to put an end to this abuse.

  1. During the recess, Obama needs to appoint every single one of the 200.
  2. During the next recess, Obama needs to appoint every single one of them.
  3. During the recess after that, Obama needs to appoint every single one of them.

Once the tactic becomes moot, so will all of the unnecessary drama.  There’s no point in Obama whining about it like a little kid.  It just makes him look petty and weak.  He is the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.  Someone needs to remind him of that sometime.

And quite frankly, if his slate of nominees are anything like his choice of White House staff, it would do him more harm than good if he did get them appointed.  Republicans shining the spotlight on them then would mean a lot more to the general public.

Related Posts

  • May 2, 2007 -- Bush vetoes the Iraqi pullout bill ( and restores the Constitution ) (4)
    Yesterday Bush vetoed the Iraqi pullout bill. In that bill, it had emergency spending for the military as well. That was both expected politically, and I expected it for bigger reasons. Spendin...
  • January 14, 2010 -- Republicans aren’t quite dead yet. (0)
    When Obama won in 2008, he brought a lot of Democrats in with him.  That was just the icing for what had been a slow erosion of the Republican pinnacle of the early 21st century.  Republicans have ...
  • October 29, 2008 -- Nancy Pelosi’s derivatives lie (1)
    Nancy Pelosi famously denied Democrats had any responsibility for the financial crisis that we are dealing with right now.  She stills sticks with that fantasy.  However, I don't think too many peo...
  • January 13, 2009 -- 2010 US Senate Races (2)
    Here we go.  The members of the US Senate class of 2008 haven't even been fully seated and we are already sepculating on 2010.  CNN has already decided the Republicans are in trouble in 2010 simply...
  • June 13, 2006 -- Karl Rove charges dropped (0)
    In July 2005, Nancy Pelosi had this to say about Karl Rove: "The president has said that anyone who leaked the identity of Ms. Plame should no longer be part of his administration. €¦ That means f...

Tags: , , , , , ,

NAVIGATION