Chris Dodd will have NOTHING to do with states rights

Chris Dodd is mad.  He’s quite upset too:

“The idea that state by state would start developing its own immigration laws in the country — imagine what a patchwork that might look like,”

He didn’t stop there.  He tossed in the only answer the Democrats seem to have any more:

“It’s demanding a national answer to immigration policy, so before this even gets further out of hand, we’ve got to step up and do the job.” 

Chris Dodd should know what he’s talking about.  The state of Arizona sits right smack on the Mexican border.  They’ve been stuck in the middle of a bloodbath going on right across that border and killing their residents too.  They’ve had to deal with drug lords killing people and generally disregarding all US laws in order to push their trash on the rest of the United States.  And, there was nothing they could do.  Since the feds wouldn’t help them, they took into their own hands.  Simple.

Wait a second, I got that all wrong.  Chris Dodd knows nothing about what’s going on in Arizona, he’s from Connecticut.  Connecticut borders no foreign country.  They have no issues whatsoever with foreign gangs creating all kinds of hell within their state.  They’re not expected by the rest of the country to slow down the drugs and violence being shipped into this country every day.

He also seems to know nothing about the US Constitution.  He is charged by that Constitution to protect us from foreign aggression.  He is really pissed that Arizona is doing just that so he’s doing what he can to put a stop to it.  He’ll be damned if he’ll let some piddly little issue like unemployment or Barack Obama harassing the banks Dodd got all his kickbacks from get in his way.  He’s going to put a stop to Arizona doing what it feels it has to to protect itself from the aggression Dodd’s government has refused to deal with. 

And, give Dodd and the Democrats enough time, they’ll totally eliminate the need for those pesky states at all.  We should all be exactly the same.  People in Arizona should be expected to deal with foreign crime within their state exactly the same way people in Connecticut do.  Anything else would be unconstitutional.

Related Posts

  • June 3, 2010 -- US-Mexico border is a safe place to be? (2)
    That's the AP headline this morning. AP Impact: US-Mexico border isn't so dangerous MEXICO CITY — It's one of the safest parts of America, and it's getting safer. It's the U.S.-Mexico border, ...
  • October 16, 2006 -- The war on drugs – Shawn Bentler (8)
    "The War on drugs" has taken a lot of flack from the liberal left of late. While most of them are more than happy to prosecute the hell out of anyone that smokes tobacco, the efforts to c...
  • May 20, 2010 -- Felipe Calderon proposes doing less to fix his country’s problem (0)
    Obama doesn't like Arizona's border security law.  According to him, Janet Napolitano, and Eric Holder, it is so bad they won't even read it.  I mean, without even having to read all sixteen pages,...
  • July 16, 2010 -- Cutting corners is a very bad thing (1)
    The Senate passed the finance reform package.  They're sending it to Congress.  It'll pass.  It's 2,300 pages.  It's 390,000 words.  When I asked a finance person what the impact would be on my per...
  • February 23, 2009 -- Bipartisanship and Medicaid (1)
    Just got the numbers for the Medicaid add-on from the stimulus package.  I don't deal with Medicaid directly, but it indirectly affects what I do in a large way.  As such, I was interested in the n...

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

NAVIGATION