US-Mexico border is a safe place to be?

That’s the AP headline this morning.

AP Impact: US-Mexico border isn’t so dangerous

MEXICO CITY — It’s one of the safest parts of America, and it’s getting safer.

It’s the U.S.-Mexico border, and even as politicians say more federal troops are needed to fight rising violence, government data obtained by The Associated Press show it actually isn’t so dangerous after all.

The top four big cities in America with the lowest rates of violent crime are all in border states: San Diego, Phoenix, El Paso and Austin, according to a new FBI report. And an in-house Customs and Border Protection report shows that Border Patrol agents face far less danger than street cops in most U.S. cities.

The Customs and Border Protection study, obtained with a Freedom of Information Act request, shows 3 percent of Border Patrol agents and officers were assaulted last year, mostly when assailants threw rocks at them. That compares with 11 percent of police officers and sheriff’s deputies assaulted during the same period, usually with guns or knives.

In addition, violent attacks against agents declined in 2009 along most of the border for the first time in seven years. So far this year assaults are slightly up, but data is incomplete.

“The border is safer now than it’s ever been,” said U.S. Customs and Border Protection spokesman Lloyd Easterling.

OK, so this article, originating from MEXICO CITY is making a claim that seems to run counter to everything we’ve been told for the last decade or so.  So, I started by researching who wrote this fact-stating article.  It was written by Martha Mendoza. 

“Politicians are hyping up this incredible fear across the country about the border, but these numbers show these are lies being perpetrated on the American public,” said immigrant advocate Isabel Garcia at Tucson-based Derechos Humanos. “The warnings about violence are just an excuse to crack down on migrants who want to work and be with their families.”

Martha rattles off a bunch of “facts” based on numbers no one actually shows.  Let’s look at the ramifications of the porous border.  Let’s do that by looking at the top 10 most violent cities in the US and why:

  • #10: Baltimore, Maryland.  Not a border city by most people’s definition.
  • #9: Nashville, Tennessee.  Not a border city by most people’s definition.
  • #8: Charleston, South Carolina.  Not a border city by most people’s defintion.
  • #7: Little Rock, Arkansas.  Not a border city by most people’s defintion.
  • #6: Orlando, Florida.  Not a border city by most people’s definition.
  • #5: Stockton, California.  Not a border city by most people’s defintion.
  • #4: Las Vegas, Nevada.  Not a border city by most people’s defintion.
  • #3: Miami, Florida.  Not a border city by most people’s defintion.
  • #2: Memphis, Tennessee.  Not a border city by most people’s definition.
  • #1: Detroit, Michigan.  Most definitely a border city.  But not the border Martha Mendoza is talking about.

All ten of these cities do have one thing in common.

All 10 of the most dangerous cities were among those identified by the Department of Justice as transit points for Mexican drug cartels.

Run by crime lords like Joaquin Guzman Lorea, these gangs–and their violent turf wars–are spreading into the American Southwest and beyond. Places like Stockton, Calif., nearly 500 miles from Tijuana, have seen an uptick in related violent crime.

“Stockton is a major transit point along the I-5 corridor on the way to Seattle and Vancouver,” says Wolfram. “A lot of it is similar to crime happening in the Southwest. For the most part, it’s drug gang on drug gang.”

Anyone with just a tiny bit of interest would find immediate overwhelming evidence that the problem is not the drugs stopping at the border and causing problems.  The problem is drugs going into our cities and causing huge problems.  Read the national headlines.  Almost every day you’ll find some story referencing Mexican drug cartels.  Here’s one from today:

Authorities say two ( Mexican ) federal police officers have been killed in a clash with gunmen in northern Mexico.

Nuevo Leon state prosecutors say the officers had stopped a car for revision when gunmen in several SUVs arrived at the scene and opened fire.

Prosecutors say a third federal officer was wounded in the Wednesday attack in the town of Garcia.

Hours later, police found the bodies of a local traffic police officer and a trainee inside a car in the nearby town of Santiago. Prosecutors said they also found two automatic rifles, a handgun and a bulletproof vest.

More than 22,700 people have been killed in Mexico since President Felipe Calderon launched a military crackdown on drug cartels shortly after taking office in December 2006.

If it’s all the same to Martha, I’m doing three things.  First of all, I’m not believing her article.  At all.  Not in the least bit.  I”m gonna bet I’m doing what most of the people near that border are doing to keep it so “safe”.  They’re staying away from it.  Second, I’m not scheduling any vacations to that area.  Not even close.  There’s nothing there that appeals to me anyway.  Lastly, I’m supporting Arizona’s efforts to make it not only safer for themselves, but safer for people living in those cities and communities infested by drug cartels bringing their drugs in by the truckload. 

Next I’m sure Martha will write an AP story about what a pleasant place to live Mexico City is.

Related Posts

  • February 23, 2009 -- Bipartisanship and Medicaid (1)
    Just got the numbers for the Medicaid add-on from the stimulus package.  I don't deal with Medicaid directly, but it indirectly affects what I do in a large way.  As such, I was interested in the n...
  • April 26, 2010 -- Chris Dodd will have NOTHING to do with states rights (0)
    Chris Dodd is mad.  He's quite upset too: "The idea that state by state would start developing its own immigration laws in the country -- imagine what a patchwork that might look like," He didn't...
  • August 16, 2005 -- Crime and Liberalism (6)
    This one has been touched on by others.  Borrowing from two previous posts, I have combined the Liberal City index again, this time with safest and most dangerous places to live index.  This is wha...
  • August 19, 2009 -- When stoners go camping (0)
    Recently about six peeps decided to go hang out in the forests of Santa Barbara County, California. For most of us, that's not much of a big deal. However, for these peeps, the story is a little di...
  • May 6, 2010 -- Properly celebrating Cinco De Mayo in the US (1)
    Five kids attending Live Oak High School in Morgan Hill, California, were sent home for wearing American flags on Cinco de Mayo.  The school is actually the one that enforced it.  For those una...

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

  • Jd

    Wow, U are totally missing the point. Arizona’s cities don’t have major drug cartel problems, nor do any of the large cities and most small communities along the US Mexican border.

    Then the cities where U say there’s violence because of the cartels is stretching the truth a little bit. Only a potion of the drugs are from the Mexican cartels and the violence itself in those cities come from local gangs, which are for the most part actually made up of citizens. Take Stockton, lot of local drug problems from meth made there, a lot of it by bikers or Mexican gang members (but they’re northern Mexicans meaning they are very likely to have been born here.) Plus remember many of those cities were seeing high crime rates long before the Mexican cartels were an issue.

  • http://politics.moonagewebdream.com Moonage

    I can’t be missing a point because I’m not making one. I am simply relating statements made by drug enforcement people that directly contradict the bizarre claim that the Mexican border is a safe place to be. You on the other hand are directly contradicting DEA. I cite their credentials, what are yours to make such a claim? The headlines this week are about how national monuments and stuff along the border are being destroyed. That seems rather ludicrous given yours and the article’s claim that this is such a wonderful place to hang out. Bottom line, the drug trade causes serious problems everywhere. The violence and problems we are dealing with are not the everyday workers wanting to earn $50 doing migrant work. The problem is the drug trade and drug war that the Mexicans are totally unable and mostly unwilling to deal with. Making bizarre claims like the fact the border itself is safer than most cities just increases the rest of the US’s gut feeling that most media is more worried about a liberal agenda than our safety.

NAVIGATION