Obama’s kinetic military action

I’d like to start with a question,

So, what’s the difference between a “war” and a “kinetic military action”?  Does the mere fact a president changes the wording allow him to completely ignore the Constitution and go to “kinetic military action”?

How big does the lie have to be before Obama supporters finally start admitting it’s a lie?  Wars are pretty big dontcha think?

For what it’s worth, I never believed in “police actions” either.  However, all combat situations did get some sort of Congressional approval.  Only one President I’m aware of attacked another country unprovoked with no approval at all from Congress.  Correct me if I’m wrong.  Yes, even Clinton’s shooting a million dollar missile up a camel’s butt had standing Congressional approval.

Related Posts

  • March 22, 2011 -- Is Libya all about the oil? (0)
    QuestionsView Results That's not my poll, but it's a dead-on appropriate question.  Obama says it's about the intended genocide Khadafi threatened.  Well, that's been going on unabated i...
  • July 24, 2009 -- When victory is not the goal (0)
    In my world, the ultimate definition of a pacifist is to enter a war and not be terribly concerned with winning.  You do this by not acknowledging it's actually a war, then equivocating what the ul...
  • March 16, 2011 -- Still pondering that no-fly zone over Libya? (2)
    Get this straight, then we'll talk about the rest: U.S. Secretary of State meets with Libyan rebels OK, we have openly sided, once again, with one side in a civil war.  Granted no one seems t...
  • February 23, 2011 -- Libya, that shining example of Human Rights (0)
    Although in the throes of civil war, Libya has never been much of a beacon of human rights.  Now, having to deal with a threat to his leadership, Gadhafi's only solution is to kill everyone.  Altho...
  • July 7, 2010 -- Who’s Gonna Win the Border War? (0)
    Who's going to win the border war?Public OpinionPoll Results

Tags: , , , , , , ,

NAVIGATION