American Atheists find the 911 Memorial cross repugnant

That’s their words, not mine:

Plaintiffs Dennis Horvitz and Kenneth Bronstein are members of American Atheists and are Atheists reared in the Jewish tradition. They find the cross, a symbol of Christianity, offensive and repugnant to their beliefs, culture, and traditions, and allege that the symbol marginalizes them as American citizens.

They even think the US Constitution thinks it’s repugnant:

The challenged cross constitutes an unlawful attempt to promote a specific religion on governmental land, diminishing the civil rights, privileges or capacities of Atheist Americans, Agnostic Americans, Jewish Americans, Muslim Americans, and all others who are not Christian Americans. Because the challenged cross promotes Christianity over all other religions, it also denies non-Christian American equal protection under the laws of the land. As such, the challenged cross is repugnant to the Constitution of the United States.

They even think it’s repugnant to the New York Constitution.

As a direct and proximate result of the unconstitutional existence of the cross, plaintiffs have suffered, and will continue to suffer, damages for which they have no clear, speedy, or adequate remedy at law. Plaintiffs seek a declaration that the inclusion of a cross at the September 11 Memorial and Museum, in the absence of equal acknowledgment of those nonChristians who also were victims of the 9/11 attack, is repugnant to the Constitution of the State of New York. American Atheists seek injunctive relieve against inclusion of the cross and/or an order that a memorial to the non-religious Americans who fell victim to the 9/11 attack be placed within the September 11 Memorial and Museum near the cross. Named plaintiffs also seek injunctive relieve against the inclusion of the cross, together with nominal damages, costs, and attorney fees.

Repugnant seems an awful harsh word. But, that’s nothing compared to their public statement about the suit:

“It has been blessed by so-called holy men and presented as a reminder that their god, who couldn’t be bothered to stop the Muslim terrorists or prevent 3,000 people from being killed in his name, cared only enough to bestow upon us some rubble that resembles a cross. It’s a truly ridiculous assertion.”

Bitter, much?

This is what they find so repugnant:

911 Cross

A poll:

I find it repugnant they’re asking for “nominal damages”.

Greedy, much?

If they’re not just doing it for the money, then they’re doing it because they are remarkably intolerant.

When confronted with things I deem repugnant, I look the other way.  It’s really not that hard to do.  I may bitch about it, but I certainly don’t resort to hiring a bunch of lawyers to deprive everyone else of viewing something they might enjoy.

The courts have become increasingly anti-religious, so I’m not going to bet on how this goes. Common sense tells me these guys will lose.  Common sense, judges, and New York don’t always go together tho.

Related Posts

  • August 9, 2010 -- Is the 14th Amendment still needed? (1)
      John Boehner says maybe not. What do you think? [polldaddy poll=3593581] OK, now what I'd really like to actually discuss is how many people actually know WHY the 14th exists and why it ac...
  • June 8, 2012 -- When Fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in a flag and waving a cross. (0)
    That quote is making the rounds right now.  According to some it's from Sinclair Lewis in 1935 and proves that Republicans are fascists today.  People have debated at great length over how accurate...
  • December 19, 2007 -- Look unto the bookshelf, Paul is dead (0)
    Mike Huckabee ran a tv ad wishing everyone a Merry Christmas.  Boring you say?  Well, some people can find something interesting in anything.  Namely, this extremely controversial image appeared wi...
  • September 11, 2007 -- Dennis Kucinich proves he’s nuts (0)
    Congress passed a resolution establishing September 11th as a day of rememberance.  It honors those who died on September 11, 2007.  It also honors those that eventually served in Afghanistan and I...
  • October 11, 2006 -- The Arizona 9/11 “Memorial” Commission (2)
    Impossible to single one person out on this one. The entire commission belongs there. In case you don't know what I'm referring to, watch THIS.  Once you do, you'll understand why I consider t...

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

  • http://www.livewyre.net Jay

    Should we also remove the crosses from Christian graves and churches to appease these people? There are some people who spend their life looking for the opportunity to get offended..! Congratulations, you just got offended again!

NAVIGATION