27
Jul
Here’s today’s headline:
Study: Even Infrequent Use of Marijuana Increases Risk of Psychosis by 40 Percent
And here’s a snippet of the article:
LONDON Using marijuana seems to increase the chance of becoming psychotic, researchers report in an analysis of past research that reignites the issue of whether pot is dangerous.
The new review suggests that even infrequent use could raise the small but real risk of this serious mental illness by 40 percent.
Doctors have long suspected a connection and say the latest findings underline the need to highlight marijuana’s long-term risks. The research, paid for by the British Health Department, is being published Friday in medical journal The Lancet.
Now, I have reported on this issue before. However, at that time, I kinda poked fun at the issue. However, on this blog, it takes a little different perspective. For instance, I just did a post on the New World Order. Now, in order to believe in the New World Order, you have to believe in aliens, satanic rituals, people eating babies, men in black, and just about every single conspiracy theory that has ever existed is all a coordinated plan to rule the world by a select few super-intellectuals that include George W. Bush and Bill Clinton. I came to the conclusion one has to be crazier than a bird to believe in the New World Order. Being crazier than a bird is a layman’s term for one of the myriad of psychosis. In addition, I have a hard time understanding some uber-liberals logic. It just doesn’t make sense. The Iraq conflict has exposed them with a bright shining beacon. Their logic is that since the US was attacked, and we attacked back, we’re less safe now than we were when we were being attacked even though we haven’t been attacked since we attacked. Go figure that one huh? My logic is polar opposite. Since we haven’t been attacked since then, we’re doing something right. Then of course, you got the Bush destroying all our civil rights crowd. I love them. They cite nothing to support their phobia but are scared to death of the president they poke fun at for being almost completely unable to speak a coherent sentence. The blogdom is overwhelmed by bloggers publicly protesting their loss of those freedoms that they don’t know if they ever had or not. Go figure that one as well. Then of course, you got the Charlie Sheens and Rosie O’Donnells that are quite certain President Bush single handedly brought down the World Trade Centers while muddling a speech to elementary school kids, citing the fact fire couldn’t melt steel while a bridge in Oakland was melting from a truck fire. That irony was of course a setup by the New World Order to make Bush look smart. Go figure all that if you can. It never stops. The headline story of the week is Ward Churchill claiming that plagiarism, theft, citing non-facts as facts, harassment, copyright infringement, lying, and teaching unverified conspiracy theories are a protected form of freedom of speech and should be supported with taxpayer money. I just don’t get that one either. These are just a few examples. I could cite many, many, many, more. Now, having a little experience in the field of psychosis, I recognize it to a certain degree. However, rather than just taking my word for it, let’s look a little closer, shall we?
From Wiki:
Now, that sound familiar? It should. I won’t take it to the next level because things could get excessively long and I try to adhere to the 100 word rule for the most part. However, a lot of these people exhibit to me a certain degree of psychosis. Not the paralyzing schizophrenia of The Wall
Following me so far? OK, now, let’s look at the social norm of the last forty years or so. According to the Office of National Drug Control Policy, kids smoking pot “in the last month” are about 18% (varies pretty wildly from year to year ). Now, what percentage of the US would you guess is uber-liberal? I’m not talking run of the mill liberal here, I’m talking those people, like Ward Churchill, Charlie Sheen, and Rosie O’Donnell, that have fears of persons completely unfounded by reality and could care less about the real world. I’m gonna bet it’s somewhere around 18% and varying wildly year to year. Now, what’s scary to me these days is that most of our government leadership grew up in the 60′s. I think you can figure where I’m going with that, so I’ll just leave it there.
I’m not EVEN going to tackle what meth does to your brain. However, some people are quite certain communism is a good thing and some even think being a Nazi in this modern era has its advantages. Something’s amiss there as well. And, I don’t think pot’s strong enough to do it.
25
Jul
Finally.? I’ve been following the Ward Churchill saga for about two and a half years.? Finally, he gets what he deserved.? He got canned.? The saga’s not completely over yet.? After taking two and half years to figure out he lied about his credentials and plagiarized to boot, he’s threatening to sue the school.? My guess, this goes nowhere but yet another self-promoting tour to promote his whacked ideas and super-inflated ego.? The sooner this nut fades to black the better off this country will be.
17
Jul
I have often heard people say so-and-so is part of the New World Order. Now, up until now I always just came to the conclusion whenever I heard that whoever was saying it was slightly askew in their thinking. However, I came to the conclusion that wasn’t a nice thing to do since I was so completely ignorant of what they meant. So, having a spare ten minutes this evening, I decided to do some research. Rather than hop-skotching through the half dozen references I ran across, it all seemed to come together in one neat page at a place called educate-yourself.org. Now, I don’t know if these people believe all this, or are just educating us as to what it is. Whichever, it’s a lot more complicated than I thought. So, I’m just going to pull the pieces that brought me to my over-all conclusion of what I think about the New World Order. OK? Before I get trashed for only picking the snippets I want, the entire thing is in that link up there labeled “educate-yourself.org”. Got it? Okay, here goes:
There is a worldwide conspiracy being orchestrated by an extremely powerful and influential group of genetically-related individuals (at least at the highest echelons) which include many of the world’s wealthiest people, top political leaders, and corporate elite, as well as members of the so-called Black Nobility of Europe (dominated by the British Crown) whose goal is to create a One World (fascist) Government, stripped of nationalistic and regional boundaries, that is obedient to their agenda. Their intention is to effect complete and total control over every human being on the planet and to dramatically reduce the world’s population by 5.5 Billion people. While the name New World Order is a term frequently used today when referring to this group, it’s more useful to identify the principal organizations, institutions, and individuals who make up this vast interlocking spiderweb of elite conspirators……..
One note right here, according to this author, the New World Order dates back to at least 1898. However, current events and agencies established as late as 1979 are included. Whoever planned all this was psychic apparently. Nevermind all that, let’s continue.
The sheer magnitude and complex web of deceit surrounding the individuals and organizations involved in this conspiracy is mind boggling, even for the most astute among us. Most people react with disbelief and skepticism towards the topic, unaware that they have been conditioned (brainwashed) to react with skepticism by institutional and media influences that were created by the Mother of All mind control organizations……
Already covering their bases. If you don’t believe, you’re brainwashed.
What most Americans believe to be “Public Opinion” is in reality carefully crafted and scripted propaganda designed to elicit a desired behavioral response from the public. Public opinion polls are really taken with the intent of gauging the public’s acceptance of the Illuminati’s planned programs. A strong showing in the polls tells the Illuminati that the programing is “taking”, while a poor showing tells the NWO manipulators that they have to recast or “tweak” the programming until the desired response is achieved. While the thrust and content of the propaganda is decided at Tavistock, implementation of the propaganda is executed in the United States by well over 200 ‘think tanks’ such as the Rand Corporation and the Brookings Institute which are overseen and directed by the top NWO mind control organization in the United States, the Stanford Research Institute (SRI) in Menlo Park, California.
Got that? 200 “think tanks” control what 300 million Americans think. According to them, we must all think exactly alike so they only have to tweak their mind control. That pesky polarization of the US apparently is just a mind control thing and doesn’t really exist. That’s cool with me. I hate it when people don’t agree with me 100% all the time.
The conflict is drawn to the world stage by the controlled media outlets with a barrage of photos and video tape reports of horrific and bloody atrocities suffered by innocent civilians. The cry goes up “Something has to be done!” And That is the desired Reaction (note: the same technique is presently being used to bring about gun control in the United States).
And the War in Iraq, and the famines of Africa, and the terrorist bombings, the reactions to the terrorist bombings, the third-world Muslim dismemberments of people, and even shock videos on the internet. Shoot, I can’t even watch MTV with getting a “desired reaction”. The problem I have here is there is so much horrific and bloody atrocities in the media there is no sway in any direction.
The NWO puppeteers then provide the Solution by sending in UN ‘Peace Keepers’ (Bosnia) or a UN ‘Coalition Force’ (Gulf War) or NATO Bombers and then ground troops (Kosovo). Once installed, the ‘peace keepers’ never leave (Bosnia, Kosovo). The idea is to have NWO controlled ground troops in all major countries or strategic areas where significant resistance to the New World Order takeover is likely to be encountered.
The NWO can have places where UN troops don’t leave. Whenever we do leave, they start killing each other again. Name one place where it hasn’t happened. Now, this is where it stars getting juicy ( if the previous hasn’t already gotten your attention ).
The local, sovereign military force is either defeated (i.e. Yugoslavia) or, as in the case of the United States itself, replaced by foreign UN “Partnership For Peace” (PFP) troops who take over the jobs of US soldiers who have been sent overseas on ‘peacekeeping’ missions. In addition to being killed in ground conflicts on foreign soil, US military forces will likely be reduced in the next few years through disease induced attrition (i.e. from mandatory Anthrax Vaccinations required of all US military personnel). These vaccinations will, in all probability, eventually produce the symptoms of the so-called Gulf War Illness, which was acquired by a certain percentage of Gulf War soldiers who were given a “special” anthrax vaccine (intended by the Illuminati/CIA as a test run to ascertain how quickly (and fatally) the disease would progress with a substantial population of healthy young men and women).
You got it, the Gulf War Syndrome is INTENTIONAL. How’s that for provoking the desired emotional response? According to this guy, killing off our soldiers who are no longer in service has a purpose. It just keeps getting better.
The United Nations, along with all the agencies working under the UN umbrella, such as the World Health Organization (WHO), are full time players in this scheme. Similarly, NATO is a military tool of the NWO.
You got it, ANY coalition force is a member of NWO and to be feared.
The leaders of all major industrial countries like the United States, England, Germany, Italy, Australia, New Zealand, etc. (E.g. members of the “G7/G8″ ) are active and fully cooperative participants in this conspiracy. In this century, the degree of control exerted by the Illuminati has advanced to the point that only certain hand-picked individuals, who are groomed and selected by the Illuminati are even eligible to become the prime minister or president of countries like England, Germany, or The United States. It didn’t matter whether Bill Clinton or Bob Dole won the Presidency in 1996, the results would have been the same (except maybe for Zipper Gate ). Both men are playing on the same team for the same ball club. Anyone who isn’t a team player is taken out: i.e.President Kennedy, Ali Bhutto (Pakistan) and Aldo Moro (Italy). More recently, Admiral Borda and William Colby were also killed because they were either unwilling to go along with the conspiracy to destroy America, weren’t cooperating in some capacity, or were attempting to expose/ thwart the Takeover agenda.
Now, this confuses me. If NATO and the UN are part of the conspiracy, and the US completely controls NATO, and has veto-power over the UN, why would US presidents be willing to destroy America? It would seem to me these guys, more than anyone else IN the New World Order, would want to RUN the New World Order. And, given that kind of control, could very easily have done it immediately following WWII when Russia and all of the industrialized economies were in complete shambles EXCEPT the United States?
Most of the major wars, political upheavals, and economic depression/recessions of the past 100 years (and earlier) were carefully planned and instigated by the machinations of these elites. They include The Spanish-American War (1898), World War I and World War II; TheGreat Depression; the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917; the Rise of Nazi Germany; the Korean War; the Vietnam War; the 1989-91″fall” of Soviet Communism, the 1991 Gulf War; and the recent War in Kosovo. Even the French Revolution was an orchestrated into existence by the Barvaian Illuminati and the House of Rothchild.
Told ya, it just keeps getting better and better. Who do you suppose apparently orchestrated all these global and regionals conflist?
In America, the Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) was created in 1979 under Presidential Memorandum 32 authored for President Carter by Prof. Samuel P. Huntington, a Harvard professor and former FEMA Advisory Board chairman. Huntington wrote the Seminal Peace for the Trilateral Commission in the mid 70′s, in which he criticized democracy and economic development as outdated ideas.
You got it. FEMA. Created in 1979, it apparently was the coordinator of several wars going back nearly 300 years before it existed. Of course, in order to buy this part, you have to assume it was just double-top-secret for 300 years. I’ll buy that just to get to the next part.
Huntington’s ideas were rewritten into National Security Decision Directive #47 (NSDD47), which was enacted in July 1982 by President Reagan. Treated as a passing footnote by the media, this law identified legitimate areas to be upgraded to maintain national defense, but it also laid the groundwork for Emergency Mobilization Preparedness, a plan under which existing socio/economic regulations or other legal constraints would be waived in the event of a national emergency. This plan was further strengthened in Public Law 101-647, signed by President Bush in November 1990.What it boils down to is this: in the event that the President declares a national emergency, for any reason (from major earthquakes to increased international tensions or economic /financial crisis of any stripe), FEMA can then, at their discretion, implement Executive Orders 10995 through 11005. These Executive Orders permit a takeover by FEMA of local, state, and national governments and the suspension of constitutional guarantees. FEMA will have the authority to exert any sort of control that it deems necessary upon the American public. A trained National Police Force, formally referred to by the name of Multi Jurisdictional Task Force (MJTF), wearing black uniforms and composed of:
1. specially selected US military personnel
2. foreign military units carrying United Nations ID cards, and
3. specially trained existing police groups from larger metropolitan American cities.These members of the MJTF will implement and enforce martial law under the direction and controlof FEMA. The President and Congress are out of the loop.
FEMA is the Trojan Horse by which the New World Order will implement overt, police-state control over the American populace.
OK, now follow that one. In the case of national emergency, the President can cede all authority to the MJTF, thereby taking himself completely out of the loop. Yeah, that’s gonna happen. I seem to recall an event somewhere around 9/11/01 where that actually happened. Of course, the exact opposite happened during that national emergency. President Bush consolidated his authority, stripped down several layers of beauracracy, and consolidated several agencies that were fighting with each other for funding into one. During Katrina, there were no men in black
Now, if you’ve made it this far, it only gets better. This is where I think the entire theory kind of jumps the shark:
The “War on Drugs” is a cruel joke. The US government, specifically the CIA, is the biggest ‘drug lord’ on the planet. Drug money is used to pay for innumerable ‘black projects’, including the construction of huge underground cities housing both humans and aliens working with the secret US government.
Ya got that? We have a secret US government? Oh, can’t forget those aliens. It keeps going….
Recent revelations from deprogrammed Illuminati (government) mind controlled individuals such as Arizona Wilder (The Biggest Secret), Cisco Wheeler ( Deeper Insights Into the Illuminati Formula Used to Create an Undetectable Total Mind-controlled Slave
), Cathy O’Brien (Trance Formation of America: The True Life Story of a CIA Mind Control Slave
), and Brice Taylor (Thanks For The Memories … The Truth Has Set Me Free! The Memoirs of Bob Hope’s and Henry Kissinger’s Mind-Controlled Slave
) leave NO DOUBT that the upper levels of the Illuminati engage in Satanic rituals which usually include the killing of young children, the drinking of human blood and the consuming of flesh and human organs.
Ya know, I just really don’t see Laura allowing George to kill young children and drinking human blood and consuming flesh and human organs. Call me naive if you want, but I’ve George a couple of times. The site of beer makes him nervous these days. I just don’t buy that. I’m sure Kos and the like do tho.
And you want to know the weirdest part of all? Check THIS out:
To be Continued & Expanded…
What’s so weird about that you say? How’s about this: IT NEVER WAS! Apparently the Illuminati got ahold of Ken Adachi ( that’s the author ). Did they eat him? Did they inject him with Anthrax? Did they subject him to the men in black? I dunno exactly, but he sure seems to have found other ways to amuse himself in the meantime. You can read that exchange if you wish, I don’t want any of it here.
What the NWO does is tie together very neatly every major conspiracy theory there is going. UFO’s, the Kennedy Assassination, WWII, every single one. It even tacitly covers the latest conspiracy theory, global warming. Now, before going off the deep end, hear me out. There are two divergent schools of thought on global warming. One is that is purely a man-made event that will destroy the planet unless we stop doing whatever it is we’re doing to create it. The second is that it is a natural occurance that man can only mitigate to some degree. Now, if you buy into the first scenario, that it is a man-made event that will destroy the Earth, thereby killing off probably 5.5 billion people ( see above ), is it only a coincedence that the figure-head for the global warming movement is………
Al Gore? As a former vice-president, would he not be a member of the Illuminati? Since he obviously is, and his argument is we need to STOP global warming, then the mind-control people would be wanting us to believe global warming is truly a threat ( since he is a member of the mind-control people ). Therefore, since Al Gore is a member of NWO, and hasn’t been killed for resisting the NWO, this must be the NWO in action.
Therefore, the logical conclusion of all this is carbon offsets are a way to bypass global warming standards thereby leading to the actual destruction of Earth and MUST BE STOPPED!
OR
The other logical conclusion to all this is you have to be crazier than hell to believe in the New World Order.
You really, really, do.
I have argued here a long time that most of the fears of nuclear energy are based on fear itself. Fear of the unknown as people don’t easily comprehend how nuclear energy works and don’t want to look into enough to sate those fears. People like Helen Caldicott and a lot of the media fan those fears based on their fear as well. The worst case scenarios are always painted with catastrophic results of millions of people dieing horrible deaths, etc.. Well, Helen’s worst case scenario hit Japan yesterday as a 6.8 magnitude earthquake hit one of Japan’s largest and most powerful reactors. To say the message sent afterwards by the media are confusing is to say the least. Here’s the media headline via CNN:
Report: Radioactivity leaked from Japan nuke plant
And, here’s the only reference to radioactivity in the report:
Earlier, Motoyasu Tamaki, a Tokyo Electric Power Co. official, said there was no release of radioactivity or damage to the reactors.
So, which is it? BBC has this to say:
A strong earthquake in central Japan has damaged a large nuclear power plant causing a leak of radioactive material, officials at the plant have said.
Of course, they don’t actually quote anyone.
Reuters India is a little more specific:
They do quote someone.
When quoting people, no radiation was leaked. When NOT quoting someone, radiation was leaked.
My bet, no radiation was leaked of any substantial proportion. A generator isn’t really a serious mechanical part in containing radiation.
This just plays into what I have always felt. Media loves a good conspiracy, even if they have to make it up. The easy assumption to make is because a nuclear plant was damaged in any way, radioactive waste HAS to escape. Fact is, they’re a lot sturdier than that. I’ve seen pictures of the plant. There’s nothing to indicate there was any serious damage to the structure. My bet is BBC embellished just a LITTLE bit.
Now, are Helen and the anti-nuclear peeps gonna admit that nuclear energy is a little safer than they’ve been telling us? I bet the half-life of plutonium expires first.
July 15, 2007 UPDATE: According to NEW reports some radiation might have been released in the form of water spilling into the ocean and busted barrels. To date, no illnesses or injuries have been reported due to this possible release.
Aaron Hanscom over at Pajamas Media makes an observation regarding Rosie O’Donnell’s comments that radical Christianity is as dangerous as radical Islam. Notably:
Now, the problem I have is Hanscom generalizing the word “radical”. Now, what Rosie actually said was:
The key words here being”where we have separation of church and state”. What I’m getting to here is Hanscom generalizes Rosie’s comments as being an overall “radical” element whereas what Rosie is saying that it is an individual threat here. In the US ( come on Rosie, “America” is not a country ), the threat is from individuals because the government basically does not involve itself in individual religious rights. However, that doesn’t protect anyone. What it does is punish those who trespass against others after the fact. So, Rosie’s wrong in her general summation that she’s any safer here than there. In a country like “America”, the “radicals” are just as free to kill her because she’s gay as they are in Iraq. In Iraq, they don’t really prosecute or punish people for killing gays. In “America”, the killer is more likely to spend some time in prison and possibly walk free than they are to be given equal justice. So, what’s terribly different in regards to the victim? One person is dead, the killer is not. Googling “hate crime” will get you all kinds of examples of violence against gays. Most of them in “America”. So, Rosie’s assumption that Christianity is as much a threat in America as radical Muslim is correct until we truly take the measures it takes to prove otherwise. ( That would be enacting the death penalty without exceptions when the evidence is overwhelming on a federal level. )
However, it’s a 100% strawman point. It’s based on the assumption that radical Christians are basically the only threat. Here, we’ve got a myriad of radical organizations. Not all of them are based on religion. The Arians for example, are based purely on a political philosophy. I’m not sure that they single out gays, but whether you’re gay or not, they can be a threat. One of the most violent has been an environmental advocacy group. If they kill you, and you’re gay, it wasn’t because you were gay. And, it wasn’t because they are radical Christians. The only difference I’m getting at is getting killed by a radical Islamist in “America” is possible. However, you’re more likely to get killed by one of the myriad of other violent groups protesting about anything you can dream up. So, what Rosie is concluding is the government makes all things equal for a terrorist. It does, but that proves nothing. It only proves you’re as likely to be threatened by a tree-hugger as a radical Islam. That’s not much of a point to make.
Now, I’m just as lost by Hanscom’s rebuttal that homosexuality is punishable by death in most Islam societies. What’s the point of that? Rosie is careful to point out the seperation of church and state, Hanscom rebuts with the example of no separation. We’re not comparing apples here. Rosie I think was trashing Christianity by pointing out it has its radical elements as well. Hanscom pointing out Islam has its radical elements as well proves nothing in regards to what Rosie was comparing. Now, what I think Rosie was getting at is that the US government doesn’t endorse any religion, which leaves them all on the same playing field, even if that playing field condones violence. What Hanscom is trying to point out is that Islam in its nature does not allow a level playing field. As screwed up as I think I am getting this entire scenario, the bottom line I think it paints is that both of these people seem to indicate, when taken together, that religion in general breeds the radicals that we have to fear.
I don’t believe that. Radicals are radicals. I fear the tree-spikers as much as I do the abortion clinic bombers as I do the jihadist as I do the Nazi. They are all terrorists with no respect for life in general. I have always felt that a terrorist is just looking for a cause to promote the instincts they already have. Someone born and living the life of a saint is not going to suddenly become a terrorist because they convert to Islam or Greenpeace. The assumption Rosie is making and Hanscom ( and others ) is rebutting is therefore moot and rather than making it a very selective us versus them, should be including all radicals. Just because you fear radical Christians doesn’t make you safe from radical Muslims or radical environmentalists. They kill indiscriminately. They kill because you are human. They kill no matter where you are. They kill because they kill. It’s just that simple.
So, Rosie, quit being so narrow and shallow that you feel compelled to put radical Christians on a level by comparing them to radical Islam. And Hanscom, quit running with the assumption Islam in general is dangerous. It dilutes all the other terrorists that probably are feeling left out right now. The last thing we need to be doing is motivating all the non-Christian and non-Muslim terrorists. Dontcha think?
8
Jun
While the rabid liberals spend their time typing their fingers till they’re falling off on their blogs and stuff coming up with more juvenile inane ways to slander the President of our great country, that said President of our great country is obviously getting the last laugh:
That’s right Kos and all, while you’re wasting your life away blogging incessantly about Bush, Bush is apparently having a good time scoring some suds and down-blouses.
Every time the G-8 convenes, a bunch of people feel compelled to protest. More often than not they don’t know why, they just know they have to. Like you know when you have to poop, pee, and eat, these people know they have to protest. Case in point about how they don’t even seem to know what they are protesting against:
All I’ve got to go by is the video and pictures of what they are doing. I don’t care enough to research any further. However, it is apparently obvious to me this year they are protesting clowns. Now, that’s all fine and good, and people have the right to protest anything they want, but last I heard, the G-8 supported the rights of all clowns in the world to look clownish any time they chose so long as they didn’t ask the non-clowns of the world to loan them billions of dollars they never intended to pay back.
When a person is sure that burning stuff makes the environment better, they need to be locked up. These people are nuts. My gut instinct is they just enjoy burning things, and look for a reason to do it.
This is unreal.
Tonya Bell, it seems, worked for the Mayor’s office. Today the Mayor’s office issued this statement:
Apparently whoever wrote the letter didn’t check Tonya Bell’s employer’s background too well either. Marion Barry, believe it or not, who’s been busted for using crack as well, indicates to me that whoever placed in him the position he’s in now, did not properly investigate his background prior to placing him in their office.
Are we supposed to believe this is just a coincidence?
Kinda hard to win the war on drugs when people elect crack addicts to their council.
The idiot of the day here is not Tonya Bell, she’s going to hell and apparently already knows it. It’s not Marion Barry, he’s going to hell and making good money doing it. It’s the voters of DC who keep electing the lowest common denominator without any regard whatsoever of the moral example they set. It may be a coincidence that crack seems to run rampant around Marion Barry, or it may not. It apparently doesn’t matter in DC.
27
May
Was reading this story on Fox. It’s about Bill cheating on Hillary to the point where he decided to divorce Hillary and she talked him out of it. Nothing that really surprised me. However, what I got at the very end was shocking tho:
As a result, Clinton’s chief-of-staff Betsey Wright took him to see a therapist.
You scroll and scroll and there is NOTHING. Not one single word. No story, nothing.
Hillary MUST have gotten ahold of Fox, but apparently just a little too late to prevent the copy that’s there from making it. I’ll bet the rest is gone before too long as well, but I linked it anyway.
It’s a vast left-wing conspiracy I tell ya!
