Posts Tagged ‘eric holder’

Obama sues Arizona

July 6th, 2010 | 5 Comments

As expected, the United States Department of Justice is apparently filing suit againt the state of Arizona over its immigrant law.  Apparently Eric Holder will be running with a pre-emptive supremacy clause.  The way I understand it is Holder will be arguing that federal law trumps state law. And it does. And Holder will lose. [...]

An informed debate on Arizona’s immigrant law?

May 19th, 2010 | 1 Comment

This thing over the Arizona immigrant law is pathetic. Janet Napolitano thinks it’s horrible.  She knows it creates racial profiling.  She hasn’t read it. Eric Holder is quite certain it’s illegal.  That it violates several Constitutional rights.  He hasn’t read it but he plans to file suits on behalf of the federal government. Now, Felipe [...]

I don’t care about the constitution on this

April 2nd, 2010 | 1 Comment

This doesn’t come as a surprise to anyone I’m sure: In his defense of supporting Obamacare, Congressman Phil Hare states very assuredly he doesn’t care about the Constitution on this issue. Mainly because we’re assured of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. But none of that really matters because people are going bankrupt paying [...]

Eric Holder really is an idiot

February 23rd, 2010 | No Comments

Eric Holder was quite proud of himself yesterday.  Najibullah Zazi pleaded guilty to planning a terrorist attack on New York City.  This according to Holder, was proof that his decision to try Khalid Sheikh Mohammed in New York City was justified. Now, there are some differences between the two that Holder apparently doesn’t consider important [...]

Eric Holder

November 20th, 2009 | No Comments

  I try to come up with witty post titles to show how clever I am.  However, in Eric Holder’s case this week, he’s got me.  There are so many choices to pick from I get a brain freeze simply trying to pick one, or two, or three. Now, I’m not stupid, and most people [...]

The newer, better, worse, hate crimes bill

October 15th, 2009 | No Comments

First, the obvious: Per Eric Holder, the new hate crimes bill was not intended to protect everyone equally under the law. I got a problem with that.  The ONLY intent of the US Constitution and the Bill of Rights is to insure everyone is protected equally by the law.  For the US Attorney General to [...]

Henry Waxman wants to suppress me!

February 17th, 2009 | 1 Comment

This isn’t the first time this has happened, but it’s being discussed again ( via Kerry Picket at Newsbusters.org ): The House Energy and Commerce Committee is also looking at how it can put in place policies that would allow it greater oversight of the Internet. “Internet radio is becoming a big deal, and we’re seeing [...]

Obama’s hiccups

January 14th, 2009 | No Comments

Everyone is saying this has been a near-flawless transition: It had to come some time. Despite a nearly flawless transition period of astute, substantive and widely praised cabinet appointments, the nascent Obama administration has unintentionally provoked its first controversy. Significantly, it is in the sphere of national security. I haven’t been quite as impressed. Bill [...]

Change you can believe in?

November 20th, 2008 | No Comments

Well, after demanding change for two solid years, and getting a LOT of people to buy into his change, Obama’s “change” is starting to take shape.  This is what it is possibly looking like now that Obama’s had a couple of weeks to vet the changelings he wants spearheading his change.   Janet Napolitano.  You [...]