I did NOT have sext with that woman. Or that one. Or that one.
Weiner Woman
That line that would have worked I think.
Unfortunately “I was hacked” was instead. Arrogrant pricks just don’t garner much sympathy.
16
Sep
Jon Stewart on his Daily Show:
ACORN appears to be a corrupt organization that aids and abets criminals and gets millions of dollars in taxpayer money. [...]
Well, this is an impressive expose. I’d love to know the intrepid journalists who broke this story. “60 Minutes”? The AP? That guy who gets the predators?
(Shows video of O’Keefe appearing on Fox News).
Are you f**king kidding me? First of all, you don’t have to tell us you’re a white guy. Your pimp costume appears to be a fur coat on top of your Andover uniform. Second of all, where were the real reporters on this story? You know what investigative media, see me on camera three: Where the hell were you? You know who broke this story? These two.
(Shows picture of O’Keefe and Giles.)
Your telling me that two kids from the cast of “High School Musical III” can break this story with a video camera and their grandmother’s chinchilla coat? And you got nothing? They did it for $3,000, and that’s Blitzer’s monthly beard Wetvac budget. It probably cost CNN that much to turn on their hologram machine.
I’m a fake journalist, and I’m embarrassed these guys scooped me. Let’s get to work people.
However, what Stewart apparently missed was the initial call for the fake journalists to take the lead in the first place:
“I don’t even know about it,” Gibson said, laughing. “So you’ve got me at a loss. … But my goodness, if it’s got everything, including sleaziness in it, we should talk about it in the morning.”…
But Gibson told a radio show Tuesday morning that he wasn’t familiar with the story — and it might be “just one you leave to the cables.”
Later Jon Banner explained that:
So, in other words Jon, the real journalists aren’t going to touch this no matter how salacious and headline grabbing it may become. It’s up to the fake journalists such as yourself to inform the world of the excesses and abuses…….
Nah, all that’s just noise. Now it’s becoming clear that Obama financed his way to the Oval Office on the backs of tax-evading vote-buying young white pimps and their even younger pasty white pimpettes trying to get federal loans to import underage sex slaves to help them shake down banks into making home loans to people who get their financial consulting from tax-evading vote-buying people of color and voting as many times as they can for the man who would be president so they wouldn’t have to worry about those risky loans they never could afford in the first place. Hell, we’ve even got a murder confession in today’s episode. No one seems to believe her tho. The actual murder was probably pre-empted by Obama’s non-constitutional joint house session that led directly to a lecture on respect and decorum from a Congressman who won’t follow IRS decorum and pay taxes, and the subsequent vote to not censure the Congressman who didn’t follow the decorum no one knew about at the meeting that wasn’t a joint. It would have been worse, but he whispered something so softly Hank Johnson couldn’t understand what he was saying. Robert Byrd heard “KKK”, but couldn’t remember who said it. The secret will be revealed in the next episode ( spoiler alert ), that what Joe Wilson actually said was “You lie! (whispered), Taylor Swift’s video is the best”. At that point, Kanye West is rumored to have an uncredited cameo, asaulting the teen girl once again while claiming Beyonce is the best public option of all time.
Who better to keep us up to date on all this than a fake journalist on a comedy channel?
Here’s my early morning list of the jerks of the day:
- Tom Bates, Mayor
- Calvin Fong
- Linda Maio
- Darryl Moore
- Maxwell Anderson
- Dona Spring
- Laurie Capitelli
- Betty Olds
- Kriss Worthington
- Gordon Wozniak
They all get it for abusing their position as a representative FOR Berkeley in order to embarass the rest of the country, which they do not represent.
If Berkeley feels so compelled to speak on behalf of someone in Kentucky, be assured that person in Kentucky is more than ready to speak on behalf of the Berkeley City Council and say they are completely bonkers and I object to their motions and resolutions via a Point of Order that the resolution is not germaine to the entity considering the resolution and therefore should be reconsindered and removed from the table.
Of course, from what I can tell, points of order are completely irrelevent in Berkeley.
Needless to say, I won’t be visiting Berkeley again any time soon. Someone let me know when they elect a City Council with some God given sense.
Here’s part of the agenda of a recent governmental entity:
5. Discussion on a proposal to express Solidarity with Firestone Natural Rubber Company Workers in Liberia, and formulation of a recommendation to City Council.
6. Discussion on the Subcommittee on United Nations Reports and a recommendation to extend the Subcommittee through December 2008
7. Discussion on a request for the Peace & Justice Commission to co-sponsor the January 26, 2008 United Nations Association Symposium on the 60th Anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and formulation of a recommendation to the City Council.
And:
Withdrawal of
California National Guard Troops from Iraq Changing the United States Drug Policy
Chevron Corporation
Marine Recruiting Office in the City of Berkeley
Believe it or not, that’s a city council meeting. I don’t see anywhere in there where they actually discuss their own city’s maintenance.However, they did find time to:
- Asking the city attorney to investigate what the city can do with respect to the military recruiting office, given a conflict between the military’s prohibition against recruiting homosexuals and the city’s laws prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.
- Asking the city manager to write letters to various U.S. Marine officials, telling them “that the marine recruiting office is not welcome in our city, and if recruiters choose to stay, they do so as uninvited and unwelcome intruders.”
- Encouraging those groups that “volunteer to impede, passively or actively, by nonviolent means, the work of any military recruiting office located in the city of Berkeley.”
Folks, this stuff is straight out of their minutes. And, fearing not the military, apparently they do fear colognes, as they also demand:
Please refrain from wearing scented products to public meetings.
I kid you not. Straight out of THEIR agenda.
Berkeley, I’m here to tell ya. Most all of the rest of the country used to think your town is nuts. Now we know for sure they are. It’s bad enough to constantly trash people who’d lay down their lives for you all, but why the hell spend taxpayer money worrying about workers in Libya, the United Nations, and bunch of other crap that has nothing to do with the taxpayer money that put them there? I can guarantee you all 100% that if my councilor went to meetings and discussed nothing but garbage that did not affect my tax money, they’d be out ASAP. And, they know it. My city council’s pretty screwed up right now. But, I am quite certain, there is not a worse city council in the United States than Berkeley has right now. That agenda for the 2/2/04 meeting is a 100% waste of Berkeley taxpayer money. 100%. They are worried about everything BUT the welfare of Berkeley. I know a few people in Berkeley. They’re nowhere near as detached from reality as these council members are. I sure wish they’d run for council.
My idiot of the day, obviously, is most of the Berkeley City Council. Their arrogance and ignorance of why they are there amazes me.
From Reuters:
U.S. Congresswoman Marcy Kaptur came to a House committee hearing on Thursday prepared to ask U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson tough questions about his involvement in the subprime mortgage crisis.
Unfortunately, she was questioning the chairman of the Federal Reserve.
The Ohio Democrat, at a House of Representatives Budget Committee hearing, said she wanted to know what Wall Street firms were responsible for the securitization of subprime mortgages. She then asked: “Seeing as how you were the former CEO of Goldman Sachs …” But the only person testifying at the hearing interrupted.
“No, no, no, you’re confusing me with the Treasury Secretary,” said Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke.
“I’ve got the wrong firm? Paulson, Oh, OK. Where were you sir?” Kaptur said. Bernanke noted that he was head of the Princeton University economics department.
“Oh, Princeton, oh, all right, sorry. I got you confused with the other one … I’m glad you clarified that for the record,” she said.
Now, she might have just had a simple lapse here. So, the way I do things is look at whether that’s likely or not. Here’s Marcy’s background that prepared her for delving into this issue:
- graduated from St. Ursula Academy, Toledo, Ohio, 1964
- B.A., University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis., 1968
- M.A., University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich., 1974
- attended the University of Manchester, Manchester, England, 1974
- post-graduate studies, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass., 1981
- urban planner, Toledo-Lucas County, Ohio, Plan Commissions, 1969-1975
- director of planning, National Center for Urban Ethnic Affairs, 1975-1977
- assistant director for urban affairs, domestic policy staff, Executive Office of the President, 1977-1979
- elected as a Democrat to the Ninety-eighth and to the twelve succeeding Congresses (January 3, 1983-present).
My guess, she’s sticking her nose in an issue she has no clue about what she’s talking about. Or, more importantly, what they are talking about. I also find it somewhat disturbing that she immediately assumes Paulson is from the private sector.
It’s distrurbing to me to know Marcy’s tackling that pesky private sector issue that is the subprime lending issue. If this is how she prepares for the issue, I think I’d prefer she leave the issue alone. Given she apparently has no private sector experience, I question why she’s on this committee in the first place. Being as it’s a private sector issue, I’d prefer Congress leave it alone regardless.
Originally, I thought this was going to be the idiot of the day. Then, I was going to morph into Big Brother run amok. But, the story reads a lot different than the obvious.
And, it sort of finishes with:
“‘I didn’t know what to tell her,”‘ Spruill said the constituent told him before Spruill vowed to stop such displays.
“I said, ‘Sir, I’m going to be a laughingstock, but I’m going to do it,”‘ he said.
Fox then goes on to illustrate some other “offbeat” bills in Virginia. In this case, the only thing offbeat about it is Spruill singling out rubber hitch testicles. If he had broadened it to include all sexual organs, then I think it would have been a little less offbeat and make a lot more sense. And quite frankly, carting around a five year old myself, I can appreciate the predicament whoever thought publicly displaying testicles on a hitch placed on all the parents of small children in. The legislature can’t ban stupid or inconsiderate. However, they can let them know what stupid is by giving police the ability to correct their stupid actions. If whoever thinks rubber testicles is a fashion statement wants everyone to know they have a thing for rubber testicles, they can display them at home or INSIDE their vehicle in such a way as to not impress small kids. Since apparently some people aren’t bright enough to figure out the impact they are having on innocent children, and the parents thereof, it’s up to people like Lionel Spruill to make a public fool of himself in order to protect our children from the inconsiderate idiots.
Kudos to Mrs. Moon for pointing out that I needed to address this important issue.
( BTW, the idiot of the day is not Del. Spruill, it’s the idiots driving around with their rubber testicles exposed to small children. )
13
Dec
This is dumb. Walmart was selling these clever little panties:
On the back it says “When you have Santa”.
Someone objected so Walmart is yanking them off the shelves.
Grow
up
people.
They’re cute. So what if it infers something a little risque? If I find them at my local Walmart before they hide them, I’m buying some for the step-girl. And, if they come in Mrs. Moon’s size, I’ll get her some as well. ( Point of clarification, according to the story, they only come in junior sizes. That’s a marketing mistake if you ask me. )
Almost lost in the midst Hillary being labeled a “bitch” and whether or not Barack properly poses during the National Anthem was this major headline on Fox:
High School Cheerleaders Suspended for Flashing Crowd During Britney Spears Routine
I immediately had flashbacks to my high school days. Now, our cheerleaders fit the stereotypes to a T. Not terribly bright, and the least temptation and their clothes fell off. So, needless to say, I had pre-conceptions of what had happened here. I mean, what does EVERYONE think when they are “flashed”? So, needless to say, I clicked. What I found there was just a scintillating:
Click here to watch a video of the cheerleader’s risque routine in the Modesto Bee.
So, I did.
I wasn’t flashed.
This is so incredibly lame I had to blog about it.
Six girls were suspended from school for bearing the bottoms of their uniforms. Not THEIR bottoms, but the bottoms of their uniforms. Not lacy panties. Their uniforms. There is nothing risque here folks. There certainly isn’t any flashing.
I was incredibly disappointed.
But, beyond that, I have to wonder what the Ripon High School BoE is thinking by suspending these girls for showing a part of their uniform that is visible every single time they do a cartwheel or flip?
How many lawyers are there in Ripon? I can imagine six are chomping at the bit right now.
But, it just strikes me that Leo Zuber of the Ripon BoE is setting yet another horrific example for his kids. It’s no wonder so many kids come out of high school completely clueless to what’s important and what’s not.
What’s the drop-out rate at Ripon? What’s the college graduate rate for Ripon High students? How many former Ripon students are in jails? Worry about that stuff Zuber. Teach them what’s important. Picking on students that are socially active and meeting the responsibilities it takes to be on the cheerleader squad is sending the wrong message. Especially to those kids that won’t graduate, won’t go to college, and will wind up in jail. It tells them that you can try hard and be punished, or not try at all and not be.
Think about that Leo.
And someone PLEASE give the definition of “flashing” to Fox.
31
Oct
There’s a lot being said over waterboarding. Michael Mukasey’s nomination is said to be “drowning” over this one single issue. Joe Biden and Patrick Leahy, who are prone to oppose just about anything for the sake of politics, are “concerned” that Mukasey, rather than completely cowering and denouncing PC-torture-procedure-of-the-day, stated he’d rather look at each instance as it occurs to see what laws were broken. Imagine that, a lawyer who’d rather look at the facts as opposed to publicly pinning himself in a corner. How stupid can he be? Leahy and Biden could care less about circumstances, they want to define what the military can or can not do in a way that strikes back to the days of “the wall“. It was the pandering of the CIA director to a political flunky to the Attorney General that led to the events of 9/11. Biden and Leahy were here then. They should know as well or better than anyone what happens when politicians wank security and defense issues.
But that’s exactly what they are doing now. And no one is calling their bluff. They are trying to micro-manage our ability to collect information by pinning this entire nomination on one issue that is probably never used and very few people even know what it is. The next nomination, if Mukasey fails, will know they have to pander to Biden and Leahy in order to get the nomination. That scares me folks.
Even if we never do waterboarding ( whatever the hell that is ), I’d like for our enemies to at least think we did on a very regular basis. Biden and Leahy would like them to think that if they do get caught, they’ll get a vacation where they’re well-fed, rested, and primed and ready to go at it again.
That’s just stupid.
I’d be more concerned if I thought Biden had a ghost chance in hell of winning.
You know you’re in a bad way when Google’s context sensitive advertising does this:
Now, ya just gotta wonder why “Ann Coulter” would even come up in an article that never mentions her. More politics by Google? Or, is Ann’s name now so synonomous with “Jew” that Google’s engine just can’t help it?
Honestly, I would not place a bet either way.
